Type to search

Ask Dr. Politics: Which Potato Head Do You Want For President?

Campaign 2016 Elections Featured Post Memo Pad Politics Top News

Ask Dr. Politics: Which Potato Head Do You Want For President?


Ask Dr. Politics! You are fair, and I am unbalanced!

Q: I’ve been feeling very depressed lately, and I am wondering whether you can help.

A: Take this simple test.

1) I live in the United States of America.

2) I cannot afford to move to Vancouver on Nov. 9.

If you answered “yes” to either of those questions, you have every right to feel depressed because it is overwhelmingly likely that our next president will have an approval rating lower than dirt.

Q: Yeah, but I read that approval ratings are just a bunch of baloney dreamed up by the media over the years to increase their circulation, viewership and/or clicks. In other words, we shouldn’t take them too seriously.

A: Wow, who wrote something as idiotic as that?

Q: You did.

A: Oh. In that case, it may be true. But keep in mind that one of these two potato heads is going to win the presidency. So we should vote for the potato head who would cause the least damage to our democracy.

Q: What do the candidates say?

A: Last week, Hillary Clinton said in Reno, Nevada: “From the start, Donald Trump has built his campaign on prejudice and paranoia. He is taking hate groups mainstream and helping a radical fringe take over the Republican Party. His disregard for the values that make our country great is profoundly dangerous.”

And Trump said: “Clinton is going to try and accuse … decent Americans who support this campaign, your campaign, of being racists, which we’re not. It’s the oldest play in the Democratic playbook. … The people of this country who want their laws enforced and respected, respected by all, and who want their borders secured are not racists.”

Q: Can we believe either of them?

A: An excellent question. Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway said in a statement Thursday that Clinton’s speech “proved to the American public what we have known all along — Hillary Clinton has no hope, no vision and no ideas for the future of our country. … We’re living in her head rent-free, and that must terrify the political insiders who want to keep things exactly the way they are.”

Q: What does it mean that we’re “living in her head rent-free”?

A: No idea, but if Clinton is really our new landlord, I’d like lower rent, more hot water in the morning and those darn millennials below me to stop playing Skrillex and Diplo’s “Where Are Ü Now” all day and all night long.

Q: You should run for president.

A: I have seriously considered it. With the Gallup Poll from last month showing Trump with a 63 percent unfavorable rating and Clinton with a 54 percent unfavorable rating, you gotta figure anybody should give it a try. Nobody can figure out why some people hate these two and why some people love them.

As Trump said at a rally in January in Sioux Center, Iowa: “I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose any voters.”

Q: But if the guy Trump shot died, wouldn’t Trump lose that vote?

A: Not if the guy were registered in Chicago.

Q: Huma Abedin is a close adviser to Hillary Clinton. Abedin recently separated from her husband, Anthony Weiner, after Weiner sent “suggestive images” and messages to a woman with his young son beside him. In other words, Weiner, a former congressman, appears to be a very disturbed guy.

Trump now says Clinton may have given classified information to Abedin, who then may have passed it on to Weiner. There is no proof, but should we be worried?

A: Abedin is supposed to be very bright, so it is hard to believe she would give Weiner access to any sensitive material, including her Netflix password.

Q: But Trump said in a statement: “I only worry for the country in that Hillary Clinton was careless and negligent in allowing Weiner to have such close proximity to highly classified information. Who knows what he learned and who he told? It’s just another example of Hillary Clinton’s bad judgment.”

A: And Trump, who has all the good judgment of a box of rocks, might pass on classified material to just about anybody through carelessness and negligence. Trump received his first classified national security briefing Aug. 17 against the vociferous opposition of Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, who argued that Trump was too irresponsible to get such material.

“I would suggest to the intelligence agencies … don’t tell him anything. Just fake it, because this man is dangerous.” Reid said. “Fake it. Pretend you’re doing a briefing, but you can’t give him any information.”

Q: Is that good advice?

A: I’m not sure. After all, Trump has demonstrated he can keep a secret.

Q: He has?

A: Sure. He is keeping his tax returns a huge secret.

Roger Simon is Politico’s chief political columnist. His new e-book, “Reckoning: Campaign 2012 and the Fight for the Soul of America,” can be found on Amazon.com, BN.com and iTunes. To find out more about Roger Simon and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators webpage at www.creators.com.


Photo: David Amsler



  1. Oddworld August 31, 2016

    Two polarizing candidates, both unpopular, both with two very different visions for America. Major differences in character, one has been in
    politics their whole life and has racked up scandal after scandal without ever having been convicted of a single crime in spite of alleged evidence to the contrary while the other has made a career
    out of dubious business ventures, 4 bankruptcies, several failed marriages, been investigated and fined by the Justice Department for violating the Fair Housing Act, is unabashedly controversial and has all the subtlety and nuance of a sledgehammer. For me it is more a
    question of the lesser of two evils….I have to go with Clinton or not vote at all.

    1. dtgraham August 31, 2016

      Agreed. When all is said and done, how do you vote for Trump?

      What do you think of this Daily Caller story that Preet Bharara, among other special prosecutors outside the DOJ, are investigating the Clinton Foundation on corruption charges? The FBI are also supposedly involved and are supposed to be serious about this one.

      The problem of course is that it comes from the wingnut media. Carlson’s Caller may be a smidgen more mainstream than many of the others, but that’s a pretty low bar. Still, a broken clock is right twice a day and even the National Enquirer has broken true stories ahead of everyone else.

      As of a few days ago, I was having a hard time finding information on this from other sources. They would just reference the Daily Caller story. That doesn’t give me a lot of confidence in it, but it doesn’t necessarily disprove it.

      1. Oddworld August 31, 2016

        You’re right, it doesn’t disprove it but it is a HUGE red flag. I’ve never liked the Clintons even when they were in the Whitehouse but I try to fair about all things when possible. I thought what the Newt Gingrich led GOP did to the Clintons was total horseshit in spite of my personal dislike of them. And the attacks have never ceased.

        I don’t purport to know anything about the Clinton Foundation, I’ve only heard the accusations. Frankly speaking, it is a waste of time for any of us to discuss matters we know nothing about (not trying to be rude). There’s too much conjecture going on
        and it is near the end of campaign season so you really have to take into consideration that it’s just more crap being thrown at the wall by the GOP in the hope that something will stick. All the GOP has to do is create reasonable doubt close enough to Election Day to have a chance of winning.

        1. dtgraham September 1, 2016

          I wasn’t interested in any discussion of the Clinton Foundation. Just wondering if you’d heard anything about this story.

          1. Oddworld September 1, 2016

            I apologize, I thought you were asking for my opinion. I haven’t heard anything outside of the usual conspiracy driven GOP.

          2. dtgraham September 1, 2016

            I worded that wrong. I said, what do you think? I should have said, do you know anything about it? My apologies too.

          3. Oddworld September 1, 2016

            Screw it! We’ll blame it on the computers:>)

          4. dtgraham September 1, 2016


      2. Kathleeneford2 September 1, 2016

        Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj321d:
        On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
        ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash321GroupSpotGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!mj321d:….,…..


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.