Type to search

U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Texas Appeal Over Voter ID Law

Elections Headlines National News Politics Reuters US

U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Texas Appeal Over Voter ID Law

Supreme Court

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal by Texas seeking to revive the state’s strict Republican-backed voter-identification requirements that a lower court found had a discriminatory effect on black and Hispanic people.

The justices let stand a July 2016 decision by a lower court that found that the 2011 Texas statute ran afoul of a federal law that bars racial discrimination in elections and directed a lower court to find a way to fix the law’s discriminatory effects against minorities.

There were no noted dissents from the high court’s decision not to hear the case from any of the eight justices, but Chief Justice John Roberts took the unusual step of issuing a statement explaining why the case was not taken up, noting that litigation on the matter is continuing in lower courts.

Roberts said that although there was “no barrier to our review,” all the legal issues can be raised on appeal at a later time.

The law, passed by a Republican-led legislature and signed by a Republican governor, had been considered one of the strictest of its type in the United States. It was challenged in court by the U.S. Justice Department under former President Barack Obama, civil rights groups and individual voters.

Critics including the Obama administration had said the Texas law and similar statutes enacted in other Republican-governed states were tailored to make it harder for minorities including black and Hispanic voters, who tend to support Democrats, to cast ballots. Backers of these laws have said they are necessary to prevent voter fraud, despite little evidence of such fraud.

The seven types of government-issued identification permitted under the law as proof of identity included a driver’s license, a concealed handgun license, a military ID card and a U.S. passport but not state university ID cards or identification issued to obtain welfare benefits.

A special 15-judge panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 9-6 that the Texas law had a discriminatory effect and violated the U.S. Voting Rights Act. The judges were divided differently on other parts of the ruling.

The appeals court directed a federal district court to examine claims by the plaintiffs that the law was actually intended to be discriminatory, rather than merely having a discriminatory effect.

A hearing on that part of the case was scheduled for Tuesday but has now been delayed following a request from President Donald Trump’s administration. While Obama’s administration had backed the challenge to the Texas requirements, the Trump administration could change course.

Republican Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, whose office launched the appeal, said he was disappointed by the court’s action.

“Texas enacted a common sense voter ID law to safeguard the integrity of our elections, and we will continue to fight for the law in the district court, the Fifth Circuit, and if necessary, the Supreme Court again,” Paxton said in a statement.

Challengers of the Texas law have said that up to 600,000 people would be unable to vote if the law were fully in effect because of the large number of voters who lack the limited types of permissible identification.

After the appeals court ruling, Texas and the plaintiffs struck a deal for a short-term remedy to be used for the November 2016 election.

The Texas law is one of several passed by Republican legislatures since 2010. A similar law in North Carolina was struck down by a federal appeals court in July 2016.

(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Additional reporting by Jon Herskovitz in Austin, Texas; Editing by Will Dunham)

IMAGE: U.S. Supreme Court is seen in Washington, U.S., October 3, 2016. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas



  1. Lynda Groom January 23, 2017

    Interesting is it not?

  2. A_Real_Einstein January 23, 2017

    God forgive these Republicans as they have forsaken Him.

  3. Aaron_of_Portsmouth January 23, 2017

    The GOP’s godless and persistent quest to make it hard to vote is just a resurrection of the old Southern Strategy to keep former slaves off ht voting roles to consolidate and maintain control. By continuing this strategy, the GOP has allowed itself to be “possessed” by the ghosts of the Old South, and help secure the longed for and oft-spoken dream among the majority “tribe” who settled in the South. That dream is epitomized in the post-Civil War cry of “The South Shall Rise Again”, and our dear and esteemed GOP and its electorate across the country are seeing to it that the “Ghosts of Mississippi”, of Texas, Alabama, etc. will find new and inviting roosting sites from Maine to Calif., Arizona, Indiana, Missouri, the northwest and all other points in between.

    Donald J. Trump-Wallace-Putin is now the ranking agent in charge of dispatching these ghosts across America.

  4. johninPCFL January 23, 2017

    What Roberts really meant to say is that there’s no reason to take the case up now where a tie allows the lower court’s decision to stand when he can wait a few months for Agent Orange’s pick to be confirmed and begin his fascist rule.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.