Type to search

Thanks To Trump, Newspapers Matter Again

Media National News Politics Top News US White House

Thanks To Trump, Newspapers Matter Again

News, Newspapers

I’m beginning to feel like Sally Field.

Remember the 1985 Academy Awards, when she was stunned by the idea of being accepted? “And I can’t deny the fact that you like me!” she gushed. “Right now! You like me!”

I could give the same speech today.

I am, you see, employed in an industry that is dealing with, well … let’s be diplomatic and call them “challenges.” Truth is, though, the newspaper business is “challenged” in the same sense the Titanic was “leaky.”

Wherever I travel, I make a point of picking up the local paper. Almost always, it is like holding a cancer patient, some stricken friend you haven’t seen in awhile. You are shocked by how thin and flimsy it has become, how little substance remains. Budgets are shrinking, ad revenue is declining, some cities no longer have seven day a week home delivery, some don’t even have seven day a week newspapers.

And now, all of a sudden: “You like me! Right now! You like me!”

Which is to say that lately, I’ve been hearing from readers who say they’ve found renewed appreciation for newspapers as we trudge through the Valley of the Shadow of Trump. They see them as the last line of defense between 2017 and “1984.”

Initially, I didn’t attach much importance to such comments; I thought it was just a few isolated folks. But I’ve since learned that other journalists are hearing the same thing. Amazingly, a number of papers are reporting that subscriptions are up since the November election. The Washington Post has even hung out the “Help Wanted” sign.

Apparently, Donald Trump is good for business. Who knew?

I am of multiple minds about this. In the first place, as already noted, there’s the Sally Field response. Close behind that there is a wish that some of this love had been in evidence 10 years ago when I began losing friends and colleagues to the unemployment line

And close behind both is a realization that, while an uptick in subscriptions is certainly a good thing, it is unlikely to be a panacea for what ails newspapers. The changes wrought to the business model by the technological revolution of the last quarter century are too profound. The Internet has hollowed this business out like a cantaloupe.

We are, as a nation, poorer for that.

In the clangorous acrimony of our hyperpartisan politics, in the forward rush to master the new tricks and the next technology, we somehow lost appreciation for the values this old technology — we’re talking things that happened yesterday printed on dead trees, for criminy sake! — brought, quite literally, to the table.

When I say that, I don’t intend to signal some romantic rumination about lingering over breakfast with the sports page, or the tactile joys of ink and paper, though those things are not unimportant. But I’m talking about information, the kind of in-depth briefing for which television lacks the time and Facebook, the authority. I’m talking about knowledge that equips a citizen to hold his or her government to account. I’m talking about the fact that facts matter.

This is what some people seem to have belatedly remembered. It’s what seems to be prodding their return.

I’m more than glad to have them back, but pardon me if I regard all this with a jaundiced eye. The newspaper, we used to say, is the watchdog of power. Well, it seems to me that some of us are only just now — i.e., since November — discovering the paradox of watchdogs: You can get along fine without them. You really don’t need one.

Right up until you do.

IMAGE: NS Newsflash via Flickr

Leonard Pitts Jr.

Leonard Pitts Jr. is a nationally syndicated commentator, journalist, and novelist. Pitts' column for the Miami Herald deals with the intersection between race, politics, and culture, and has won him multiple awards including a Pulitzer Prize in 2004.

The highly regarded novel, Freeman (2009), is his most recent book.

  • 1


  1. plc97477 March 6, 2017

    Thank you Mr. Pitts for standing up for none-fake news.

    1. Jennieeevans March 7, 2017

      Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj359d:
      On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash359HomeVideoGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!mj359d:…

  2. Dapper Dan March 6, 2017

    Understand newspapers never really fell out of favor. Others like myself now get our news online and I myself subscribe to both the Washington Post and New York Times. The digital versions are always breaking and up to date where the printed version is Day old news. You can also comment immediately to a story you’ve read where back in the day you had to write a letter and mail it. The paper may or may not print it a few days later but by then is old news anyway. The medium may have changed where more of us now get the news on a tablet but we still revere newspapers more than ever

  3. Aaron_of_Portsmouth March 6, 2017

    The internet is a valuable tool, but many today have devolved to a point where reading more than a paragraph becomes a chore—much better they feel to read a headline, a tweet, or text replete with acronyms because it’s easier on the fingers and you don’t have to worry so much about misspelling. As a result, spelling ability has dropped, the concentration, clarity, and “helpful” emotions needed to frame and articulate concepts are diminished or nonexistent. Books no longer are as popular, digital or paper—the problem with digital is that overuse is damaging to the brain’s neurocircuitry and impairs the brain’s ability to repair pathways that need healing, leading to limited capacity for complex thoughts and creativity. A recent book, “The Shallows—What the Internet is doing to our Brains”, by Nicholas Carr, provides insight on this phenomenon, and the effect of television combined with less exposure to nature since the Industrial Revolution, are also damaging influences on the ability to reflect, leaves less time for solitude in order to contemplate, and makes for a build-up of antisocial responses.

    Digital is fine, but in moderation, like everything else. Besides, constant looking down at our screens while walking is a safety hazard and leads to a possible evolution of humans with necks curved and the head oriented downwards at a 45 degree angle. I don’t think that would be appealing.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.