Type to search

Trump Does Not Have A Mandate For Racism

Campaign 2016 Elections Featured Post Politics Top News US

Trump Does Not Have A Mandate For Racism

Share
Trump does not have a mandate for racism

Buckle-up friends, it’s going to be a hairy ride.

Start with Day One for President Trump (gotta get used to saying that). He will need to be up-and-at-’em no later than 12:01 am, for during his campaign he promised to get oodles of big stuff done on his very first day in office, including: “Repeal Obamacare;” Begin working on impenetrable, physical, tall, powerful, beautiful, southern border wall;” Meet with Homeland security officials and generals to begin securing the Southern border; Fix the Department of Veterans Affairs; “Repeal every single Obama executive order;” Suspend Syrian refugee resettlement; “Get rid of gun-free zones in schools;” “End the war on coal;” “Defend the unborn;” “Start taking care of… our military;” And convene top generals and inform them they have 30 days to come up with a plan to stop ISIS.

Good grief! Americans have actually put a xenophobic-misogynous-racist-nativist-narcissistic blowhard in the Oval Office. Has our country gone right wing? Or completely nuts?

No. Trump was not elected on issues, but on anger — a deep seething fury that the economic and political elite themselves have created by knocking down the working-class majority, then callously stepping over them as if they didn’t exist. Exit polls revealed that most Trump voters don’t think he’s any more honest than Hillary Clinton (only 38 percent of all voters had a favorable opinion of him, with only a third saying he was qualified to be president). Also, his own voters disagree with much of his agenda (especially his grandiose wall across the Mexican border).

But his core message — “The system is rigged” by and for the elites – came through loud and clear to them, so they grabbed him like a big Bois-D’arc stick to whap the whole establishment upside its collective head.

The major message from voters was, “We want change.” The Donald was the one most likely to shake things up (or blow things up), while Clinton clearly was the candidate of the status quo. As a West Texas farmer told me several years ago, “status quo” is Latin for “The mess we’re in,” so change voters, including those who would normally side with Democrats, cast their ballot for the Republican.

Indeed, on specific issues, voters around the country supported very progressive changes offered to them in a variety of ballot initiatives:

—All four states that had minimum wage increases on the ballot passed them — Arizona (59 percent for it), Colorado (55 percent), Maine (55 percent), and Washington (60 percent). Plus, a South Dakota proposal to lower its minimum wage was rejected by 71 percent of voters.

—Two states had initiatives calling for a constitutional amendment to repeal the Supreme Court’s Citizen United decision that has allowed unlimited corporate cash to flood into our elections — California (53 percent for it) and Washington (64 percent “yes”). Also, 52 percent voted for campaign finance reform that will provide public funding of elections there.

—A Minnesota initiative to take away the power of state lawmakers to set their own salaries, instead creating a bipartisan citizens council to consider any increases, won a whopping 77 percent approval.

In addition, many solidly-progressive “firsts” were elected on Tuesday, such as the first Indian-American woman in Congress (Pramila Jayapala of Washington), the first Latina U.S. senator (Catherine Cortez Mastro of Nevada), first Indian-Black woman elected to U.S. Senate (Kamala Harris of California), and first openly-LGBT governor (Kate Brown of Oregon), Stephanie Murphy (of Florida)is the first Vietnamese-American woman elected to Congress, Ihlan Omar (of Minnesota) is the first Somali-American Muslim woman elected to state legislature, and Sam Park (of Georgia) became the first openly gay state legislator there.

Trump is in the White House, but the takeaway from voters in this election is a mandate for progressive economic populism and more diversity among public officials.

Tags:
Jim Hightower

Jim Hightower is a nationally syndicated columnist and one of America's most prominent progressive voices. His column carried by more than 75 publications across the country. Prior to becoming a writer, Hightower served as Texas Agricultural Commission from 1982 to 1991.

  • 1

6 Comments

  1. KathyKursh November 10, 2016

    So what happens when he cannot fulfill his campaign promises? Wall? Deportation? Jobs? Draining the swamp?
    According to Politico he is having lots of lobbyists on his team…or at least their names are being considered – Jamie Diamond from Wall Street as Secretary of the Treasury. is this getting the money out of politics?

    Reply
    1. FireBaron November 11, 2016

      You honestly expected more out of the most ethically challenged President-elect since Warren G. Harding?

      Reply
      1. KathyKursh November 11, 2016

        Yes we should hold him to his promises. Then see what happens. You know that almost everything he proposed is against the law. Should be fun to watch the legal challenges and inaction that occurs. The only person put into power that said change was Trump. Almost the entire obstructionist republicans were returned to congress. Either nothing will get done or the laws enacted will descimate this country. But it will ALL be on the republicans. They now have to do something not just oppose. I wonder if all those who voted for him will enjoy what the republicans may pass.

        Reply
  2. sarah.chen November 11, 2016

    1 yr ago I decided to abandon my office work and it changed my life… I started freelancing over internet, over a site I found over internet, several hours daily, and I earn much more than i did on my last job… My last month check was for $9k… Amazing thing about this work is the more free time i got with my family… http://korta.nu/MDe

    Reply
  3. Jon November 11, 2016

    The Republicans and Trumpanzees will eventually pay the price for what they have done. The sad part is that everyone must suffer in the meantime.

    Reply
  4. laraskelly November 20, 2016

    It’s been one yr since I decided to abandon my previous job and i couldn’t be happier now… I started to work on-line, for this company I found over internet, few hours /a day, and my income now is much bigger then it was on my office job… Last paycheck i got was for $9k… The best thing about this job is the more free time i got with my kids… http://chilp.it/8d93f4b

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.