Type to search

Here Comes The Police State

National News Top News US

Here Comes The Police State


Reprinted with permission from AlterNet.

The rise of right-wing populism in the United States—from the White House to state legislatures—has been met with public resistance on a stunning scale. Millions have taken to the streets, staged direct actions, and flooded airports to resist a flurry of presidential decrees targeting undocumented, black, refugee, LGBTQ, and poor communities. And long before Trump took the White House, the Black Lives Matter movement and indigenous water protectors at Standing Rock were leading the way with sustained mobilizations in the face of staggering repression.

Now, under cover of the Trump administration’s “law and order” platform, Republican lawmakers at the state level—often with the backing of police unions—are advancing a spate of bills aimed at crushing this groundswell. The proposed legislation would impose draconian penalties on protest organizers and participants, expanding local powers to put demonstrators in jail, seize their assets, and further criminalize property destruction.

In recent weeks and months, politicians in at least 11 states—Minnesota, Washington, Iowa, Michigan, North Dakota, Indiana, Virginia, Colorado, Missouri, North Carolina, and Arizona—have either introduced or threatened to introduce bills that make it more dangerous or costly to attend protests, or be anywhere near them. One bill recently proposed in North Dakota, and clearly aimed at Standing Rock resistance, would have expanded protections for drivers who “accidentally” hit and kill protesters. While the legislation failed earlier this month, it nonetheless reflects a troubling political push to snuff out dissent.

Using racketeering laws to go after protesters’ assets

A bill that just passed through the Arizona State Senate would expand the state’s racketeering laws on organized crime to “rioting,” broadly defined to include acts that result in property destruction. This move would broaden the powers of authorities to target protest organizers and participants—and even seize their assets.

Backed by the Arizona Police Association, Senate Bill 1142 “[e]xpands the definition of riot to include immediate power of execution which results in damage to the property of another person,” according to an Arizona State Senate fact sheet.

“A person commits riot if, with two or more other persons acting together, such person recklessly uses force or violence or threatens to use force or violence, if such threat is accompanied by immediate power of execution, which either disturbs the public peace or results in damage to the property of another person,” the bill states.

According to Steve Kilar, spokesperson for the ACLU of Arizona, the proposed legislation’s definition of rioting is “fuzzy and incredibly vague.” This law “would allow police and prosecutors to go after anyone who is at a protest” that authorities claim turned into a riot, he explained.

The Senate fact sheet notes that including “rioting” under racketeering statutes would provide prosecutors with “options that are generally not available under other types of criminal statutes, such as forfeitures, including the ability to confiscate the fruits of criminal activity from those convicted of racketeering offenses.”

The legislation itself emanates from false conspiracy theories. “Sen. Sonny Borrelli has said this is in response to unverified claims that protesters are being paid,” Kilar said. “He is using this false paid-protesters argument to connect his bill to anti-racketeering laws, which are targeting the financial incentives of criminal enterprises.”

The bill, which is headed to the Arizona House, also aims to blur the line between rioting and terrorism. According to Kilar, “If this bill were to pass, riots would join terrorism as the only racketeering crimes under Arizona state law that would not require financial incentive.”

The legislation appears to be aimed at mass mobilizations to oppose deportations. Earlier this month, ICE was met with a 15-hour, direct-action protest when it tried, with the help of Phoenix police, to deport Guadalupe García de Rayos. Protesters, including her own son and daughter, sat in the street holding hands to stop an ICE vehicle from taking away Guadalupe, who has lived in the United States for 21 years. After an hours-long stand-off, which was captured on live-stream, the mother of two was eventually deported to Mexico. By then, images of resistance against her expulsion had spread across the country.

“It appears that the state legislature wants to silence people’s voices by passing these laws,” said Ernesto Lopez, an organizer with Puente Arizona, which mobilized the opposition to Guadalupe’s deportation. “This seems to be really extreme and aimed at silencing small organizations and people’s movements in a very negative way.”

‘They’d rather we just be quiet’

The bill wending its way through Arizona’s legislature is not an isolated case. The Minnesota House of Representatives is currently weighing HF 322, which gives the city broad latitude to sue protesters for the cost of policing demonstrations. The bill’s author, Representative Nick Zerwas, once made the jaw-dropping pronouncement that “Rosa Parks sat in the front of the bus. She didn’t get out and lay down in front of the bus.”

Meanwhile another Minnesota bill, if passed, would impose harsher penalties on protesters who conduct acts of civil disobedience on highways, making such acts punishable by up to a year in jail.

Both pieces of proposed legislation target the Black Lives Matter movement in the state, which has actively protested the state-sanctioned killing of black residents, including Jamar Clark and Philando Castile.

“It is really unfortunate that this is what the GOP is choosing to focus their time on,” Mica Grimm, an organizer with Black Lives Matter – Minneapolis, told AlterNet. “I think that Trump has definitely emboldened some people in the GOP to infringe on civil liberties and criminalize dissent. They’d rather we just be quiet.”

One bill introduced in Indiana initially mandated that authorities clear protesters from roadways within 15 minutes by “any means necessary.” Following public outcry, lawmakers removed the “by any means” language from the bill, but the latest text still calls for the increased criminalization of participants in acts of civil disobedience.

Along similar lines, SF 111, currently being weighed by the Iowa legislature, says that people who blocked traffic on highways can be hit with felony charges, punishable by up to five years behind bars. The legislation was direct retaliation for November protests against Trump that shut down the I-80 highway.

Meanwhile, Washington lawmakers are currently considering SB 5009, which would stiffen penalties against protesters who cause “economic disruption,” imposing sentences ranging from 60 days to a year in jail. Sen. Doug Ericksen, who introduced the bill, said in a press statement that “The measure is prompted by recent illegal actions that have blocked rail and highway transportation, including a demonstration at a rail chokepoint in Skagit County last summer that blocked traffic between Seattle and Vancouver for 11 hours.” Over 50 people were arrested in May 2016 when they blocked trains to two key oil refineries to protest climate change and fossil fuels extraction.

‘This is how you move toward fascism and nationalism’

Heavy crackdowns on protesters are not limited to cities and towns where anti-protest bills have been introduced. Over 200 people mass arrested at an inauguration protest in Washington, D.C., have been hit with felony riot charges, each facing up to 10 years in jail and a $25,000 fine. Meanwhile, law enforcement is compelling tech giants including Apple and Facebook to mine the personal data of its users, and the companies appear to be complying.

Because the arrests took place in Washington, D.C., the cases are being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, which is directly accountable to the Department of Justice, now overseen by the notorious white supremacist Jeff Sessions.

“We are seeing Sessions prosecuting mass arrests from January 20, and it is very obvious that they are using draconian tactics to criminalize dissent,” Pooja Gehi, the executive director of the National Lawyers Guild, told AlterNet. “The protesters were charged with inciting felony riot, under a subsection that’s never used. This is a new precedent meant to terrorize people.”

Flint Taylor, a founding partner of the Chicago-based People’s Law Office, told AlterNet that he believes that Trump’s three executive orders on crime and policing have emboldened these state-level initiatives. One decree, titled “Preventing Violence Against Federal, State, Tribal, and Local Law Enforcement Officers,” is premised on the false claim that there is a war on cops. The order instructs the executive branch to “develop strategies, in a process led by the Department of Justice (Department) and within the boundaries of the Constitution and existing Federal laws, to further enhance the protection and safety of Federal, State, tribal, and local law enforcement officers.”

Sessions, who heads the DOJ, has said that he does not believe systemic police brutality is a problem worth addressing.

“The language of this executive order is focused on ‘preventing violence,’ which was the exact language of the memoranda that former FBI director J. Edgar Hoover wrote justifying the neutralization—i.e. destruction—of everyone from Martin Luther King Jr. to the Black Panthers,” said Taylor. “One of the key aspects of COINTELPRO was to ‘prevent violence.’ That was the cover for destroying movements.”

“Together with all the other preliminary indications from the Trump administration, this executive order bodes extremely ill, particularly for communities of color, in terms of unleashing the already awesome and racist power of police departments in cities across the country.”

Meanwhile, right-wing Republicans in Congress, with apparent backing from the Trump administration, are advancing efforts to declare the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization. The initiative, which emanates from far-right conspiracy theories that the Sunni Islamist group is infiltrating the U.S. government, is aimed at crushing Muslim civil society organizations at the core of resistance to Trump.

Amidst a climate of authoritarianism, anti-protest laws are advancing alongside so-called Blue Lives Matter bills that protect police officers under hate crime laws meant to safeguard historically oppressed communities. These initiatives are spreading across the country, with Republicans now in control of roughly two-thirds of the partisan legislative chambers in the United States.

“I definitely think there are a lot of Republicans who feel that Trump is a dog whistle to start writing bills that infringe on people’s rights, because we’re seeing that on a federal level,” said Grimm. “They are taking advantage of this time to make sure that people who don’t agree with them don’t have the right to express that. This is how you move toward fascism and nationalism, by getting rid of dissent.”

Sarah Lazare is a staff writer for AlterNet.

IMAGE: Sacramento Police officers gather after multiple people were stabbed during a clash between neo-Nazis holding a permitted rally and counter-protestors on Sunday at the state capitol in Sacramento, California, United States, June 26, 2016. REUTERS/Max Whittaker 



  1. Gabriel Lawson February 25, 2017

    I got paid $104k in last twelve months by doing an on-line job at home a­n­d I was able to do it by w­o­r­k­i­n­g part-time f­o­r several h each day. I’m using a business opportunity I came across from company that i found online and I am so excited that i made so much money on the side. It’s so beginner-friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. Check out what I do… http://twitter.com/StinnettMargar1/status/835567639929880576

  2. bojimbo26 February 26, 2017

    No , it`s the START of the police state .
    The actual police state will be with Trumpys White Supremacists taking the Oath of Allegiance to Trump/Bannon .

  3. yabbed February 26, 2017

    Trump has brought the era of Nazism to America and it is unthinkable that the land of the free and the home of the brave would be deconstructed in this manner into an authoritative police state. Trump is an ignorant, weak, mentally unstable freak. He should be impeached and prisoned for his crimes against the country. To have a traitor in the White House is beyond any decent American’s wildest imagination.

    1. Daniel Jones February 26, 2017

      Why is it unthinkable?

      It happened here.
      It could always happen here.

      I will *never* understand the mindset that seems to believe that crying out, “but this is America!” will make the tyrant go away.

      1. yabbed February 26, 2017

        Who said saying such would “make the tyrant go away”? I’m just not willing to treat this situation as normal for America. That’s what the Trump organization wants.

    2. Dan S February 26, 2017

      Not that I’m a psychiatrist but Trump exhibits all the signs of being schizophrenic. Being detached from reality is one of the symptoms and boy is he ever. Not behaving appropriately is another sign like grabbing women by their genitalia and he doesn’t think he’s done anything wrong. I’m quite certain Hitler and other dictators were also afflicted with mental illness. Unless Congress acts and at this point I doubt they will we’re stuck with this sick so-called President. If we can get him to release his tax returns only then will they have solid proof to impeach

  4. 2ThinkN_Do2 February 26, 2017

    So people think it is okay to destroy property in protest? To prevent people from going to their work, hospital, emergency services from responding to calls? That is more than protest, that is next to terrorist activity. You really think it’s okay to stand in the roadway and stop traffic because you don’t like something taking place in society? If you were in a car driving down the road and out of nowhere there is a mob of people blocking you; what would you do? Let’s say you decide to turn the car around and go the other direction. But wait, now the road is blocked behind you too! What is your choice?

    1. Dan S February 26, 2017

      We’re literally on the verge of Civil War as our government has demonized an entire religion blocking them unnecessarily from entry into the US and your whining about being stuck in traffic ? When it comes to property destruction that’s being done by anarchists who try to mix in with peaceful protesters and of course they get the blame. When you have civil unrest perpetrated by the so-called President the people are not just going to roll over and have their freedoms and First Amendment Rights taken from them. Look around you at the angry Town Hall meetings across the country. This wouldn’t be happening if the election had gone to Clinton

      1. 2ThinkN_Do2 February 26, 2017

        When you find that article proving that fallacy (“demonized an entire religion”), let me know; but it does not exist, except in the minds of those who seek to incite unnecessary disruption.

        1. Dan S February 26, 2017

          Tell that to the the Muslim community that’s continually being harrassed by our own government with meaningless travel bans and people setting fire to Mosques around the country.

          1. 2ThinkN_Do2 February 26, 2017

            We probably need a temporary National Curfew, no one out after dark or before sunrise without clearance. It would certainly help the murder situation in Chicago (50% occur between 6pm and 2am and another 25% between 2am and 10am). So maybe a 7pm to 5am curfew, probably cut out 65% or more of the murders. If they (murderers) alter their game plan and start doing broad daylight shootings, it would increase the odds of their being caught.

          2. I Am Helpy February 26, 2017

            Hahaha yeah you are a swastika-loving traitor.

          3. 2ThinkN_Do2 February 26, 2017

            Just like the people you pretend you’re not. You don’t know what I love or dislike; quite the opposite of what you spout though.

          4. I Am Helpy February 26, 2017

            OK traitor.

          5. Thoughtopsy February 26, 2017

            Troll and traitor. Classy.

          6. 2ThinkN_Do2 February 26, 2017

            Never lived under bridge, and still support the USA.

          7. Dan S February 26, 2017

            Seriously ? ???? So essentially you favor the USA being a police state ? This not the country we live in and there’s no Hell in way people will tolerate it. Trump tries pulling that crap here there will be all out Civil War guaranteed. We the people will RESIST ????

          8. 2ThinkN_Do2 February 26, 2017

            Generally, it is said: No way in hell. So you prefer the rampant murders in Chicago and similar places, I see . . . . it sounds like you’re saying you wouldn’t be granted after curfew clearance . . .

          9. Dan S February 26, 2017

            The violence you see is nothing until you try implementing a national curfew. If you want to see a Civil War then this is the way to start one. The end result is will be a lot of needless bloodshed

    2. I Am Helpy February 26, 2017

      Hmmm yes the US should become NAZI GERMANY because of some mythical damage that protesters are doing.

      You un-American worm.

  5. jeffromac23 February 26, 2017

    This is the stuff that happens in China or Russia not the USA. If the laws pass I can’t see the Supreme Court legitimize these laws and if they do I can see civil war breaking out.
    If 45 is allowed to install 2 Supreme Court Justice that belive the same way he does about protesters than maybe they will which is why The Resistance is so important. They say that campaign finance reform is destroying the first ammendment but these laws are the real destruction of the first ammendment and the start of the downfall of everything that makes us great.

    1. 2ThinkN_Do2 February 26, 2017

      The downfall has been going on for decades . . . .

      1. I Am Helpy February 26, 2017

        Can you state which metrics demonstrate this? I bet you can’t.

  6. OriginalUpmuuchtoolate February 26, 2017

    Republicans are traitors.

  7. hicusdicus February 27, 2017

    This all sounds reasonable to me particularly if it is my house that is about to be destroyed. Make it mandatory for anyone who is about to have their life time of work destroyed to use any means possible to protect it. people who riot are criminals who should be put down permanently.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.