Type to search

Who Could Defend Trump’s Comments About The Khan Family? Well…

Campaign 2016 Featured Post Politics Top News

Who Could Defend Trump’s Comments About The Khan Family? Well…

Former Donald Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski sings the U.S. National Anthem on the floor during the first session of the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio, U.S., July 18, 2016. REUTERS/Mark Kauzlarich

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump spent all weekend licking his wounds after the father of a fallen Muslim American soldier, Khizr Khan, gave a powerful rebuttal to his candidacy during a speech at the Democratic National Convention last week.

Trump fought back by attacking Mr. Khan’s wife for not speaking during her husband’s remarks and claiming that the sacrifices he made as a businessman were similar to the Khans’. The attacks against a grieving military family were so out of line that Republican big wigs who support Trump, like Paul Ryan and John McCain, were forced to denounce them, though they continue to support Trump’s candidacy.

Naturally, with a lack of Republican leadership coming out to defend Trump, a handful of bottom-feeder Trumplicans stepped up to, once again, defend the indefensible.


Longtime Trump adviser and “dirty trickster” Roger Stone, as usual, had the lowest response to Mr. Khan’s speech. Stone took to Twitter to share his newest conspiracy theory — that Mr. Khan is a double agent working with the Muslim Brotherhood.


Roger Stone’s tweet links to an article on a low-budget conspiracy site that accuses Mr. Khan of having links to groups planning a “military conquest” of the U.S., and shamelessly suggests that Mr. Khan’s son, Humayun Khan, may have been planning a suicide attack on his fellow soldiers.

Stone, like Trump, has made a career of accusing Liberals of being “anti-American” and not respecting the troops and military. Stone has spent the Obama years accusing the president of not being a “loyal American” because of his non-existent “Muslim ties.”

This unfounded theory about Mr. Khan is a continuation of a another ridiculous accusation Stone made, against Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin.

After the Orlando shooting at the Pulse nightclub, Stone stated that Trump would “benefit” from the tragedy and that there was now going to be a  “new focus” on what he claimed are disloyal Americans like Abedin. Stone then encouraged everyone to ask themselves about Abedin’s “troubling past.”

“Do we have a Saudi spy in our midst? Do we have a terrorist agent?”

Stone told Breitbart that “There’s going to be a new focus on whether this administration, the administration of Hillary Clinton at the State Department was permeated at the highest levels by Saudi intelligence and others who are not loyal Americans.”


Jeffrey Lord, CNN’s favorite pro-Trump talking head, defended Trump’s attacks on Mr. Khan by saying it was all “politics” and that the family was “opening themselves up to disagreement” when they agreed to go on stage at the DNC.

He also tweeted what seemed like an attack on Hillary Clinton for not enlisting in the military herself.

Former Trump campaign manager and current CNN commentator Corey Lewandowski defended Trump’s attacks on the Khans by alleging that “If Donald Trump were the president, Captain Khan would still be alive today because we would have never entered the Iraq War.”

Like Stone, Lewandowski has previously accused Obama of being anti-American. Back in May, he linked aggressive behavior towards police officers to the president, and slammed what he said was Obama “apologizing for America to foreign countries.”

“That’s not what the American people want.” Lewandowski said to Breitbart. “They want you to focus here. For us to go and apologize for something…that’s a blight on the administration,”  he added, before emphasizing how important it is to be proud to be American.


Fox News anchors Steve Doocy and Brian Kilmeade tried to belittle the overwhelming response to Mr. Khan’s speech by erroneously claiming that “no networks covered” Patricia Smith’s speech blaming her son’s death at Benghazi on Clinton at the Republican National Convention. They argued that “There is a double standard,” because  “the mainstream media is paying all the attention to the Khan family.”

Actually, their own network, Fox News, was the only news network to not cover Smith’s full speech. They aired a phone interview with Donald Trump instead.


Photo: Khizr Khan speaks during the last night of the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia



  1. Blueberry Hill August 1, 2016

    Shame on this shameless freak. Check to see how grateful the 10 soldiers families that he saved feel. You and your ilk are nothing but pond scum. The Trump Scum needs to be charged for the crimes he has and is committing. How about spending your time on that.


  2. jmprint August 1, 2016

    Looks to me that the cancer that Trump spread is not curable, we have to destroy the republican party in order rid the cancer. VOTE democrat all the way, let’s infiltrate the party with Independents, Green Party and democrats, together we can get the job done.

    1. InformedVoter August 1, 2016

      Hello racist and bigot. So Hillary can tell the families from the Benghazi political action “what difference does it make?” Stone’s comments are factual. Khan is a double agent, Trump has been proven correct 100% of the time for making comments like illegal committing more crime, etc. This will hurt the Dems in the end.

      1. jmprint August 1, 2016

        Hola village idiot. Is Stone your daddy, because he is an idiot also. Out of 120 and that’s before the convention he was at 40% correct, meaning he lies 60% of the time. Did you apply for the janitor position too, he sure does have a lot of janitors, trying to clean up the $hit that spews from his mouth. Guess it takes a $hit load of janitors.

        1. InformedVoter August 1, 2016

          Hello racist and bigot. I’m sure you know that name calling, when used during a debate, is a dead giveaway that your side is losing. Notice, calling you a racist and bigot is not name calling because they describe your words and actions. You claim to be otherwise, but your words give you away.
          Trump’s accuracy numbers are almost at 100%. His recent comments about the number of illegals is more proof. The left tried to make it look like he was wrong, but they had to admit he was spot on. But if you try and use liberal fact check sites, you would think Trump was wrong. Just like the DNC and Hillary fixed the nomination, the left plays with numbers (like unemployment numbers?) and lie to achieve their agenda.
          Recently called any well-educated black men “boy”? Your name will remain with you forever!

          1. Catherine Bouey August 1, 2016

            “Trump’s accuracy numbers are almost at 100%”

            You should try citing actual sources that aren’t easily refuted instead of pulling bullshit out of your ass. Like Trump has.

            “His recent comments about the number of illegals is more proof”.

            His insisting that Mexicans were chiefly responsible for all the crime while ignoring that most of the crime in this country is committed by born and bred Americans (some of whom aren’t guilty in the first place). Is bullshit and he deserved to get called out for it.

            “but they had to admit he was spot on.”

            Just like Trump would have to admit years earlier that he said Hillary would make a good president and did so because that’s what he legitimately believed?

            ‘But if you try and use liberal fact check sites, you would think Trump was wrong”.

            Ummm because he is wrong and you don’t have to use poltifact to prove that.

            “Just like the DNC and Hillary fixed the nomination”,

            Which the hacked emails wikileaks threw out didn’t actually prove?

            “the left plays with numbers”

            Just like the right plays with numbers concerning things like how much the ACA has costed this country? Or how many jobs would be created if the rich were allowed to pay taxes at a laughably low rate or how much voting fraud happens in this country?

            “lie to achieve their agenda”.

            Because Republicans have never done this over the last 60 years or so and to a much worse level?

            “Recently called any well-educated black men “boy?”

            Trump was the same one who called a black congressman he thought supports him “his african american” and his son just recently expressed shock that a young black man (who knows nothing about politics) could be so articulate.

            Ya might want to dial back on the shilling.

          2. Independent1 August 1, 2016

            You might be interested in just HOW INACCURATE Donald Trump really is: Politifact rates his truthfulness at 9%, compared to Hillary’s 50%.

            See this from the NYTimes:

            One basic test of a politician’s honesty is whether that person tells the truth when on the campaign trail, and by that standard Clinton does well. PolitiFact, the Pulitzer Prize-winning fact-checking site, found 50 percent of the Clinton statements it examined to be either true or mostly true.

            That compares to 49 percent for Bernie Sanders’s, 9 percent for Trump’s, 22 percent for Ted Cruz’s and 52 percent for John
            Kasich’s. Here we have a rare metric of integrity among candidates, and it suggests that contrary to popular impressions, Clinton is relatively honest — by politician standards.

            And for your information InformedVoter is arguably the most pathological lying of the right-wing trolls on the National Memo: IV will on the spur of the moment, concoct any wild contrived fantasy to ensure you that you are absolutely wrong about whatever the discussion is about. Trying to reason with IV is a total waste of time.

          3. Catherine Bouey August 2, 2016

            Oh I know it’s a fool’s game trying to reason with people like him been doing it with a number of people over Youtube the last few hours. Can’t help busting the chops of people being idiots and hypocrites all the while they accuse people of doing the same thing.

          4. toejam August 3, 2016

            An articulate Afro American some body got switched at birth.

          5. InformedVoter August 25, 2016

            So now you’re claiming that Hillary didn’t fix the Dem nomination? Trump’s statement about illegals committing more crimes than their population would call for has been proven time and again.
            Now that the ACA insurance rates are going up by double digits next year and the top two insurance companies are pulling out, dumping untold numbers to find new insurance, I guess that my comments about the ACA costing jobs has also been proven.
            You make this too easy. But since you run with the low information crowd, you have no one but yourself to blame.

          6. Catherine Bouey August 25, 2016

            So now you’re claiming that Hillary didn’t fix the Dem nomination?

            Why would I need to claim that when those hacked emails didn’t prove what you and all the embittered Bernie fans want to believe took place in the primaries or that Hillary was involved in anyway?

            “Trump’s statement about illegals committing more crimes than their population would call for has been proven time and again”.

            Yeah it’s been proven……wrong both by outlets like Politifact and crime statistics.

            “Now that the ACA insurance rates are going up by double digits next year and the top two insurance companies are pulling out, dumping untold numbers to find new insurance”,

            Yeah because this all the fault of the law itself not the greedy insurance companies who don’t like the law because it’s makes it harder for them to screw over people or various Republican Governors who have worked to undermine the expansion of medicaid in their state.

            “I guess that my comments about the ACA costing jobs has also been proven”.

            It hasn’t and that’s also not your claim that’s belongs to GOP who believe only they can create jobs, whereas Democrats cost Jobs. While conveniently forgetting who our 43rd and 40th presidents was and how high unemployment was under them.

            “But since you run with the low information crowd, you have no one but yourself to blame”.
            Just like the GOP loves to blame democrats for why black people suffer in this country even when they’re the ones who more often than not support discriminatory practices that adversely impact blacks?

          7. InformedVoter August 27, 2016

            Hillary didn’t work with the DNC chair to rig the primary? You better call Debbie W-S and ask her why she resigned! If you can’t acknowledge the fix was on, then you are even lower information than anyone thought.
            Illegals do commit more crime than their percentage of the population. Politifact and other lefty sites are wrong. OK, then explain why 31% of the prison population are illegals!
            The ACA rates are going up because the subsidies Obama put into the law were too low and ran out anyway. The two largest insurers are pulling out in 2017, which leaves millions to find new insurance policies.
            So you say costing jobs is not true, then look at this link. And this is happening all throughout the country. The ACA is dying.

          8. Catherine Bouey August 27, 2016

            “Hillary didn’t work with the DNC chair to rig the primary?”

            No did you even bother reading the emails in full or are you simply making strawmans for the sake of doing so?

            “You better call Debbie W-S and ask her why she resigned!”

            You could try reading this instead of attempting to make a point with no basis

            “If you can’t acknowledge the fix was on, then you are even lower information than anyone thought’.

            If you can’t acknowledge those emails didn’t prove Schultz nor the DNC or Hillary Clinton was actively engaged in hurting Sanders in the primaries you’re even more stupider than I already figured you were.

            “Illegals do commit more crime than their percentage of the population”.



            You might want to lay off the Trump water.

            “Politifact and other lefty sites are wrong”.

            Poltifact is neutral or have you actually bother looking into the fact they fact check democrats, republicans, & independents alike?

            “The ACA rates are going up because the subsidies Obama put into the law were too low and ran out anyway”.

            It’s not going up but not because of the subsidies. I’d explain to you why but you’d likely ignore it because you hate facts.

            “So you say costing jobs is not true”,

            I’m confused how does these insurance companies pulling out of states for their own selfish reasons affecting anyone trying to get insurance from them lead to massive job losses?

            “The ACA is dying”.

            You might wanna go tell Chicken Little you’re jacking her swagger.

          9. InformedVoter September 5, 2016

            You keep referring to politi-lie as being neutral, but it’s funded by a left organization. It has been shown that they’re only accurate 62% of the time. And the 1 out of 3 times they are wrong, they erred 90% in favor of liberal positions. In prior posts, you condemn conservative sites as being biased, yet you know no shame in accepting liberal biased sites.
            Even Debbie W-S acknowledges she resigned because of her actions to ensure Hillary got the nomination. Have you spoken with any of Bernie’s followers who wanted the primary results thrown out? And the ACA going down the drain … try this link.
            I thought I had encountered just about all the dumb low information lefties in prior forums, but then you came along and it seems I just met another low information dummy.

          10. Catherine Bouey September 5, 2016

            “You keep referring to politi-lie as being neutral, but it’s funded by a
            left organization”.

            So basically in spite of the fact they dissect, research, & criticize the comments and statements of Democrats, Republians, & Independents alike they’re still engaging in the process of lying simply because they’re supposedly funded by a left organization?……People are right the Conservative media has made a good percentage of the public stupid when it comes to acknowledging facts and disregarding lies.

            “It has been shown that they’re only accurate 62% of
            the time”.

            …..You do know that 62% is still a reasonably high and acceptable number right? And even if that figure were true (which is honestly too low) their accuracy in telling the truth would still be higher than other outlets like FoxNews and those shitty sites you linked before.

            “And the 1 out of 3 times they are wrong, they erred 90% in
            favor of liberal positions”.

            I don’t think you know how statistics work champ….like your friend Trump.

            “In prior posts, you condemn conservative
            sites as being biased, yet you know no shame in accepting liberal biased

            The legit difference though is the news you’re obtaining from these conservative news outlets aren’t generally rooted in fact for one, two they’re mostly opinion pieces which makes the claims therein even more dubious.

            “Even Debbie W-S acknowledges she resigned because of her
            actions to ensure Hillary got the nomination”.

            ……This proves Hillary was involved in her plan
            (which was never enacted) to undermine Bernie’s chances in the primaries how?…..And even when that claim can easily be taken as pure lip-service especially if you read that article that I posted that shows she was starting to piss people off in the democratic party.

            “Have you spoken with any
            of Bernie’s followers who wanted the primary results thrown out?”

            Most of whom are crazy people crying wolf, and whose claims have no basis as those emails showed that DNC didn’t actually enact their plan to undermine Bernie or his supporters during the primaries?

            the ACA going down the drain … try this link”.

            What link? And as you refuse to see the blatant conservative bias in the links you’re posting I have no reason to acknowledge them and whatever purported truth that supposedly lies therein.

            “I thought I had
            encountered just about all the dumb low information lefties in prior
            forums, but then you came along and it seems I just met another low
            information dummy”.

            You don’t know the definition of “Hypocrisy” do you?

          11. InformedVoter September 21, 2016

            You seem to have a problem understanding words. So Politi-lie dissects, etc., but when they publish their opinion that is full of mistakes and outright lies, you consider them legitimate. It’s been proven many times that the media is left biased. You lefties have a problem with the truth.
            You also seem to be in self-denial. When presented with proven information, and it conflicts with the lies that you’ve been told, you say they’re biased. And you wonder why your crowd has been labeled low information.

          12. Independent1 August 1, 2016

            As I’ve pointed out to you before, you really do need to check in with Bellview Sanatorium: YOU ARE CLEARLY LIVING IN YOUR OWN FANTASY WORLD OF PATHOLOGICAL LIES!!!

            To the point that I really question your sanity. No sane person would deliberately spew the outright pathological lies that you do, which even my 6-year-old granddaughter could tell were lies, in trying to make yourself out as the winner of a disagreement.

          13. toejam August 3, 2016

            You have a 6 year old granddaughter how frightening.

          14. InformedVoter August 3, 2016

            I call jmprint and dpaano “racist and bigot” because they used the racial slur “boy” to refer to well-educated black conservative males. If you agree with their racial slurs, then I can also apply the name to you.
            Check out this link regarding Khan.
            Here’s a link that says that ACA premiums in Obama’s home state are going up as much as 45%. Now tell me again who is lying.

            You are pathetically low information and I’m sure your granddaughter is embarrassed by your lack of knowledge.

          15. toejam August 3, 2016

            You must be hitting them where it hurts. Now they are all on your case. You have the moron battalion coming after you. Keep up the good work. General Dippano is leading the charge but don’t worry she is arrogantly stupid.

      2. King of America August 1, 2016

        You ought to consider changing your username for the sake of accuracy.

        1. InformedVoter August 1, 2016

          Typical response from the low information crowd. Ignore the facts, make up information and if all else fails, downright lie or cheat like Hillary did or else Sanders would have won.

          1. King of America August 1, 2016

            Yes yes your baseless conspiracy theories sure do prove something or other.

          2. Catherine Bouey August 1, 2016

            Uninformed Trump shill is uninformed Trump shill.

          3. Mama Bear August 2, 2016

            hopefully some day you will get over yourself and move on. Life in America.

          4. InformedVoter August 25, 2016

            Yep! If you want to upset a conservative, tell them a lie. if you want to upset a liberal, tell them the truth.
            Since it’s been proven that the Khan family has donated millions to the Clintons and that they are connected to several terrorists groups, I guess you’ve had to eat your words.
            Low information is what you are and you continue to prove it.

        2. Bill P August 1, 2016

          I have already suggested he change it to misinformed other

        3. dpaano August 2, 2016

          You’ve got a point there……

        4. Insinnergy August 2, 2016

          I vote he change it to:

      3. Sand_Cat August 1, 2016

        You’re an idiot. Anything else you want to take out of context or flat out lie about?

        1. InformedVoter August 1, 2016

          Now you’re going to claim Hillary’s comment was taken out of context? How low information does that make you look. If you meant the part about referring to JMPRINT as a racist and bigot, then you should ask him why he refers to wel-educated black males as “boys”. This issue will come back to bite the Dems.

          1. Catherine Bouey August 1, 2016

            Much like Trump’s idiotic rationale for criticizing the family of a dead soldier will come back to bite him?.,…oh wait it already is.

          2. Catherine Bouey August 2, 2016

            Yes I know his term ends next year and knew that long before you?

            Do you know how presidential terms work deary?

          3. GodBlessRealAmerica! August 2, 2016

            Liberal do you know how many executive orders Obama the fool signed? Do you know how many classified Crooked Hillary emails were sent? Do you know what dat we vote on election day? Do you know that Obama was a community organizer and a radical ?

            Do you know Obama is a hypocrite?

          4. Catherine Bouey August 2, 2016

            Much you like should know that Trump endorsed Hillary’s presidential run in 2008 or did you forget about that as easily as he did?

          5. GodBlessRealAmerica! August 2, 2016


          6. Catherine Bouey August 2, 2016

            Seems legit ask stupid questions easily answered but casually ignore them being answered when the answers make you look like a jackass engaging in a strawman.

          7. toejam August 3, 2016

            You can stop seeing jackasses if you avoid mirrors.

          8. GodBlessRealAmerica! August 2, 2016

            See below be proud of you’re arrogant. lying fool

          9. Catherine Bouey August 2, 2016

            I have no more of a reason to lie than you have to be willfully ignorant and stupid you didn’t even try to argue against the answers presented to the questions you asked.

          10. GodBlessRealAmerica! August 2, 2016

            Catherine are you okay? You seem angry and stupid. Why are you so anti Trump and pro- Crooked Lying Hillary.
            Answer because you are a Brainwashed Liberal fanatic who hates Real America!!! We coming Trump will be President guess what you can’t do a thing hahahahahahhaha its going to happen !!

          11. Catherine Bouey August 2, 2016

            “Catherine are you okay? You seem angry and stupid”.

            Say’s the guy who doesn’t know the difference between “your” and “you’re” and post pointless pictures everytime his idol is insulted.

            “Why are you so anti Trump”

            Let’s see

            – He lies.
            – He’s a hypocrite.
            – Is about as intelligent as he is worth 7 billion dollars
            – Has apparently managed to convince morons like you he’s good enough to be President even as his lack of common sense and judgement is causing the Republicans to implode on themselves not that they don’t deserve it.
            – Has ripped people off (which he lies about not doing).
            – A narcissist .

            – Makes bad arguments and uses ad hominems.
            – A man child

            – Petty.
            – Simply annoying.

            – Ugly as sin.

            “and pro- Crooked Lying Hillary”.

            The opposite of why you don’t like her but like Trump

            because you are a Brainwashed Liberal fanatic who hates Real America!!!”

            Real America isn’t a place where people think making blanket statements about Mexicans or Muslims is okay. This isn’t 2003 your moron.

            “We coming Trump will be President guess what you can’t do a thing
            hahahahahahhaha its going to happen !!”

            Yeah in spite of having no support among blacks, high unfavorability with women, Hispanics, (and the longer his petty feud with Khan goes on) Vets. To say nothing of the fact he’s causing Republicans to abandon ship. And all signs point to the fact he’s given up on winning states like Florida

          12. toejam August 3, 2016

            She will get together with Dippano and independent nitwit one and they will fabricate an answer.

          13. dpaano August 3, 2016

            Catherine….you need to give up talking to these people….it does no good and is a waste of time for those of us with intelligence! They have been totally brainwashed to believe whatever they are told to believe……even blatant lies….and nothing we say to them will change their minds. It’s pretty much a lost cause!

          14. Catherine Bouey August 2, 2016

            I ‘m proud of the fact I know the difference between “your” and “you’re”. And how to capitalize and lower case my sentences and letters when and where necessary :V

          15. toejam August 3, 2016

            You really are special, do you wear a helmet all the time or just when you speak?

          16. dpaano August 3, 2016

            Actually the items labeled as “classified” were merely marked with a small “c” in the margin…..it isn’t considered TOTALLY classified until it shows “CLASSIFIED” in big, bold RED letters at the top and bottom of the document. As someone who had a Top Secret clearance for over 23 years in the military, I think I would know this because I saw these types of documents on a daily basis!

          17. toejam August 3, 2016

            You knew all this right along. You are so special.

          18. dpaano August 2, 2016

            Apparently, this means Trump will be gone, right?

          19. toejam August 3, 2016

            You mean the relatives of those who collapsed the twin towers?

          20. InformedVoter August 25, 2016

            Now that it’s been proven that Khan has donated millions to Clinton and has links to terrorist organizations, I guess you’ve had to eat your words. Latest polls show Trump even with Hillary and Trump’s numbers are rising and Hillary’s are falling.
            Wait until the next batch of emails are released. This batch will include messages addressing Hillary’s health problems. Gonna be a fun next couple of weeks.

          21. Catherine Bouey August 25, 2016

            “Now that it’s been proven that Khan has donated millions to Clinton”.

            Much like it’s been proven Trump has donated money to the Clintons?

            has links to terrorist organizations”,

            He has no ties to any terrorist organizations what information are you gleaning this from?

            “I guess you’ve had to eat your

            What words? that Trump is awful and the GOP is to blame for why he’s gained as much prominence in the party? Which win or lose will irreparably damage the party beyond salvaging?

            Latest polls show Trump even with Hillary and Trump’s numbers
            are rising and Hillary’s are falling.

            Despite the fact that a recent poll just out today shows Hillary leading Trump by 10 points and the fact that countless other polls show her leading him by various margins. Once again where’s your citations? Or are you just as oblivious and ignorant to polling numbers and would rather make up poll numbers rather than acknowledge he’s getting his ass kicked? And unless he can get enough support among blacks, hispanics, women etc he’s not winning?

            “Wait until the next batch of
            emails are released. This batch will include messages addressing
            Hillary’s health problems”.

            No one gives two shits about her health. Much like no one gives two shits about the allegations that Trump committed statutory rape.

          22. Catherine Bouey August 27, 2016

            Should I point out that at least two of those links seem like they have a very blatant conservative slant to them. With the the one in the middle completely disregarding the fact that Trump has next to no support among blacks?

          23. Catherine Bouey August 27, 2016

            Should I point out that two of those links have blatantly conservative slants. And how the one in the middle largely disregards that Trumps popularity nationally among blacks is super low?

            Please find somewhere else to be stupid.

          24. Catherine Bouey August 27, 2016

            Should I point out that two of those links have blatantly
            conservative slants. And how the one in the middle largely disregards
            that Trumps popularity nationally among blacks is super low?

            Please find somewhere else to be stupid.

          25. InformedVoter September 5, 2016

            Typical lefty response. You are presented with proof that your position is wrong and you claim that you don’t accept the proof. Well you can deny the truth all you wish. To your fellow posters, you have been outed as being the role model for low information poster of the week.
            If you wish to upset a conservative, tell them a lie. If you wish to upset a liberal, tell them the truth. Now that you’ve been presented with the truth, you can hold your breath and cover your ears, but in the end, you are still the one looking like the low information dummy I claimed you were.

      4. Jenn August 1, 2016

        Sorry but you’re wrong. Hillary’s comment was not directed to the families of Benghazi. It was in response to a question from Senator Ron Johnson. Here is the context of the exchange.
        Johnson: No, again, we were misled that there were supposedly protests and that something sprang out of that — an assault sprang out of that — and that was easily ascertained that that was not the fact, and the American people could have known that within days and they didn’t know that.
        Mrs Clinton: “With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans.
        Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again.”
        Stones comments are factual (what facts back that up) and Trump has been correct 100% of the time regarding crimes committed by illegals? What facts back that statement up? Anyone can say things about any group but it’s just words without facts.

        1. InformedVoter August 3, 2016

          Hillary told the grieving families, face to face, that the video caused the attack. When explaining why she lied about the video is when she made her statement. In essence, she was telling the families “what …”.
          For you information, the reason I address jmprint as “racist and bigot” is that he (and dpaano) decided it would be fun to refer to well-educated black conservative males as “boy”. Racial slurs are totally unacceptable.

          1. Jenn August 3, 2016

            Yes, initially we were all told the video was the cause of the attack. If you remember, the video did generate several protests at multiple US embassies up to and during the Benghazi attack so it wouldn’t have been out of the question to think it played a role in the attack. It would have been best for them to make sure before telling the famlies but also remember the talking points came primarily from the CIA.
            I applaud you for being upset at someone who would call black males boys regardless of their political affiliation. I would hope you would be equally incensed if the young men were educated liberals. I just don’t think the name calling helps. Have a good day.

          2. InformedVoter August 3, 2016

            Within hours of the attack, Hillary sent an email to Chelsea telling her that the attack was a planned, coordinated affair but that they were telling the media it was because of the video. Obama even sent Harris on the Sunday circuit telling the lie that it was the video. Hillary met the grieving families face to face and told them it was the video.
            Obama and Hillary LIED because they had just announced how ISIS had been contained. They out and out lied.
            Now that the Khan family, after having given millions to the Clinton family, is out trying to beat back the damage that the families did to Hillary during the RNC.
            Try this link out and see if you still think Hillary is not lying.

          3. Jenn August 3, 2016

            Are you for real? Seriously? First of all you send me a link that links to a story that accuses Mr. Khan of being an agent for the Muslim Brotherhood without one iota of evidence to back it up. Then you make this claim about Hillary sending this email to Chelsea which you also have no proof. Have you no shame? Everyone knows Walid Shoebat is a fraud. He’s a liar who claimed that he attacked the Israeli bank, Bank Leumi, by firebombing it. No one, absolutely no officials in Jerusalem or America could find any evidence that an attack ever happened. Understand this, there are no records that this attack ever happened. Secondly, When Shoebat was asked whether the Shoebat Foundation is a registered charity, he said that it was registered in Pennsylvania.The Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Charitable Trusts and Organizations Section said it had no record of such a charity. When asked again, Shoebat said it was registered under a different name, but that he was not aware of the Foundation’s registered name, nor any other details, which were known only to his manager (yeah, right). Even the Allegheny County Law Library has doubts about Shoebat’s Foundation’s donation process. If the money was being given to a registered charity, the charity would have to make annual reports to the state and federal government which is not happening. You’re an “informed voter” and you find this source credible? The worse part about this whole Benghazi tragedy besides the deaths of 4 Americans is the way you and your party have politicized it. There have been 7 congressional hearings including the House Intelligence Committee lead by Republicans and a State Department hearing in which no evidence was found to back up any of the accusations that were made but you just can stop. On top of that, republicans spent over $3,500,000 of taxpayer money and this is from the party who preaches about the fiscal responsibility and government waste. As an informed voter, surely you know that there have been numerous attacks on our embassies under previous administrations. Under the Bush administration alone,13 embassies were bombed and Americans were killed. Not one, I repeat, not one hearing was held and never has America blamed the sitting secretary of state for embassy deaths. You and your party have no shame and you certainly are not informed.

          4. InformedVoter August 4, 2016

            Is your middle name “naive”? It would go well with your nick name of low information person. Hillary’s email to Chelsea was made public shortly after the fiasco. Hillary had no problem with admitting she sent it.
            It’s well documented that Khan has given millions to the Clinton Foundation and her election campaign.
            I just love your low information crowd that swoon over Hillary and ignore all the proven lies they have spewed.
            OK PROVE Khan is NOT an agent. Oh, you can’t? What a surprise!

          5. Jenn August 4, 2016

            I know that when you have no logical argument you resort to
            name calling but that says more about you than about me. For an informed voter,you have trouble telling the truth. I was well aware of the email Hillary sent her daughter in which she stated that the attacks were undertaken by an “Al Queda-like Group”. There was no mention in that email that they were going to say it was a video. Read the email here if you really want to be “informed”with facts. This is from the WSJ, a conservative newspaper. http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/10/22/hillary-clintons-email-to-chelsea-stars-in-benghazi-hearing/
            Where is you proof that the Khan’s have given Hillary
            millions? And so what if they have given Hillary money, as an informed person, surely you know that American citizens can donate to any party they want to. What are you and the scum of your party going to say about all of the Republicans who are running away from Trump and not only donating to Hillary
            but working to defeat him? Are you going to try to connect them to the Muslim Brotherhood too? You, I, and everyone who’s watching know that if Mr. Khan had been on that stage in Cleveland to support Trump, you would be praising him to
            the heavens. Pat Smith went on the stage and directly blamed Hillary for the death of her son in Benghazi. Whether I agree with her or not, she has the right to say what she wants. You don’t see progressives or Hillary running around berating this woman and complaining about how she was “viciously
            attacked” (boo-hoo), at that thing republicans called a convention, the only convention ever that made the candidate lose voters rather than bring in new voters, or crying about the “lock her up” chants that have become a rallying cry for Trumpettes. I love how you call me and anyone who isn’t a Trumpette “naïve” and “low information”. Trump is such a narcissist that all he cares about are the sheep at his rallies. He even insults you all by saying “I love uneducated people”
            (clap, clap), “informed voters”. You’re too stupid to see that he loves running his BS to people who don’t even have the sense to question him about how he’s going to do all these wonderful things he and “he alone” can do. All he says is “believe me” and you call that being an “informed voter”. I’m a successful businesswoman, without leaving a trail of lawsuits, bankruptcies, defaults, stiffed investors and contractors just to name a few and I’m not afraid to show my taxes to prove
            it. If I said to you, “send me $10,000 and I’m going to make you a million, believe me,” would you? If you really care about being informed, you would want every detail you could
            get before you would give me a dime, but no, “informed voters” like you just (clap, clap) because you don’t care that he is unfit, you just like that he’s not politically correct, he’s going to build a wall, and keep Muslims out. He even
            said he could stand in the middle of 5th avenue and shoot people and wouldn’t lose votes, (clap, clap), “informed voter”. If President Obama or Hillary said just one of the stupid and vile things Trump has said, there would be tiny, tiny particles of brain matter raining down upon us from the heads of
            everyone in your party blowing up. I know this is a very difficult time for you and your party. Even the Fox poll shows Hillary with a 10-point lead. You have spent 8 years trying to bring down President Obama, the person you hate most, but
            here he is about to leave office with some of the highest poll numbers of any president at this point in their second term. He will be succeeded by the person you hate almost as much as this president, Madam President Clinton. All the while we can sit back, me with my popcorn, you with your Trumpette cool-aid and watch as Trump continues his free-fall bringing the republican party down with him. And just think, it was a patriotic American Muslim that did what no one else has been able to do. He showed the electorate outside of the Trumpette
            rallies what a maniacal, unstable, lunatic Trump really is. God Bless America, it is already Great.

          6. InformedVoter August 25, 2016

            I don’t know why low information folks like you continue to provide “proof” for you point, but in reality, your “proof” ends up proving my point. I claimed that Hillary sent her daughter an email on the night of the attack and Hillary said they were going to claim it was caused by the video. At first you said no such email existed. Then you produce a WSJ link claiming it said nothing about the video. But did you even bother to read your own link? I think not. It clearly states that Hillary told her daughter that they were selling the video as the cause.
            Now that it’s been made public that the Khans have donated $22 million to the Clintons and the Khans have ties to several terrorists groups. here’s another example of Trump being vetted and proven to be telling the truth.
            The next batch of emails will reveal Hillary’s health problems among other issues. The latest polls have Hillary and Trump even with Trump on the rise and Hillary on the decline. With black voters now hearing the truth about the Dems and Hillary, you can expect the numbers for Trump to grow.

          7. Jenn August 25, 2016

            Did you learn to read at Trump university? I said no email existed from Hillary to Chelsea saying she was going to say it was a video which is what you claimed. Go back and read your post, here is what you said “Within hours of the attack, Hillary sent an email to Chelsea telling her
            that the attack was a planned, coordinated affair but that they were
            telling the media it was because of the video.” If there is an email to Chelsea stating that they were going to say it was a video, I’d be happy to read it so send me the link.
            Now that I’ve picked myself up off the floor from laughing at your take on Trump’s so-called outreach to black voters, I can only say that you must be as ignorant as he is about black people. As he continues to stand in front of white audiences and tell black people how poor, uneducated, and dangerous they are and their problem is that they don’t have enough policing, they along with hispanics are going to rush right out and vote for him. Are you really as crazy as he is? This is the same guy who says blacks and hispanics are lazy and criminals. The list of racist comments he has made is too long for me to list here. Yes, there are problems in poor neighborhoods, black and white, but black America also has a large community of striving, successful, hard-working, college educate people in the work force. Blacks, even poor blacks are not stupid and just because he is losing and needs all the votes he can get, they will not forget his past treatment of discriminating against them and what he’s been saying since he rode down that elevator. To top his outreach off, he just hired a white nationalist to run his campaign. Good move! That will get the black and hispanic vote! He may as well stop making a fool of himself and try to salvage his support among his white base which could be tricky considering his flip-flop on immigration. You and your conspiracy theorists should be more concerned about the brain damage of your candidate. We don’t need email to see that he’s mentally ill. By the way, using Farrakhan as a spokesperson for black people is hilarious.

          8. InformedVoter August 27, 2016

            During the congressional hearings, Hillary admitted she LIED about saying the video was the cause. She even admitted that she sent her daughter such an email. Why do you think, when she became cornered and flustered that she blurted out “what difference …”?
            As to blacks moving to Trump, read ’em and weep!

          9. Jenn August 27, 2016

            You should be a Trump surrogate because you can’t keep your lies straight. I know what she testified to now send me the link to that email she sent Chelsea where she says shes going to lie about the video or stop claiming it exists. Until you do, I’m not discussing it again.
            About that weeping: here are recent numbers,
            Blacks-Clinton 87% Trump 8%
            Hispanics-Clinton 63% Trump 22%
            Women-Clinton 57% Trump 27%
            He’s doing so badly she’s within striking distance in red states like Georgia and Utah. One can only imagine his numbers will get worse as he cozies up to the white nationalist party. I’ll meet you back here on November 9th so you can tell me where to send that truckload of tissues you will need.

          10. InformedVoter August 28, 2016

            These pollsters are the same ones who, a year ago, showed Trump way behind the other GOP candidates. So they were wrong back then as Trump amassed more votes than any other GOP candidate in history, even with such a large field. When they did their polling, they didn’t factor in that Trump supporters vote in greater numbers than the general population. I can show you polls like the link provided that are closer to reality.
            I have not altered my statements that you called lies. I’ve been consistent in my claim that Hillary told Chelsea it was a planned attack but told everyone else it was the video. Hillary and Obama did this because they had just told the US public that ISIS was being defeated. Since it appears you are not qualified to do your own research, you blindly believe the lies the Dems feed you, here are several links that clearly show that Hillary told Chelsea it was a planned attack, and then told the public it was the video. Would you be surprised that several regular posters to these threads STILL think it was caused by the video. And you challenge why I refer to you as low information. Read ’em and weep.

          11. Jenn August 28, 2016

            Once again and for the last time, It’s been well documented what Hillary and others said regarding the video initially, which by the way were also talking points provided by the CIA . The CIA talking points said that the violence in Benghazi was
            “spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in
            Cairo”, protests that themselves were motivated by anger over the
            “Innocence of Muslims” video. In addition, multiple sources reported
            that eyewitnesses thought the Benghazi violence was directly motivated
            by the video, not just indirectly via the Cairo protests. I have been disputing your claim that Hillary told Chelsea in an email that they were going to lie and tell the public it was caused by the video. You can’t produce that email because it doesn’t exist. Since you and your party can’t stop playing the blame game with the Benghazi tragedy, please answer a few questions for me. Why do conservatives act like the four Americans killed in Benghazi were the first ever killed in attacks? Why aren’t the lives of Americans who were killed in US Embassies prior to Benghazi important to conservatives? There were many more lives lost in embassy bombing under Reagan and Bush. How come conservatives didn’t investigate those killings?

            As far as the polls go, you believe the ones you want to believe and I’ll look at the reality of this race at this point. You and I both know that the reason Trump is all of a sudden pretending to go after the minority vote is because he knows he’s losing and he’s trying to convince white America that he isn’t a racist. He’s hemorrhaging college educated white voters because they are sickened by him and the only demographic he’s beating Hillary in is uneducated white men. That will only work in a republican primary. Like I said before, I’ll meet you back here November 9th. We’ll see then which polls were right.

          12. InformedVoter September 5, 2016

            It’s taken quite a while for me to stop laughing at your latest drivel of a response. Talk about changing your tune. First you claim Hillary sent NO email to Chelsea about the attacks. Then after I prove you’re low information, you reluctantly admit that Hillary did send and email to Chelsea but that Hillary said the attack was because of the video. Then after I prove that Hillary claimed the attack was premeditated you had to eat crow and accept you were once again low information and wrong!
            Now you try to deny that the FBI proved that Hillary told Chelsea the truth and then went on to lie to the public!
            Must you continue to prove you are so low and information person that you have to be led through every step? It appears so.

          13. Jenn September 5, 2016

            Nice try but you conveniently wait over a week to respond so you can avoid answering the questions I posed, but I didn’t forget. You would rather regurgitate the same old tired talking points because you have nothing else. I enjoy debating the issues especially with people I disagree with but you don’t know how to do that. If you want to have a serious conversation about something important I’ll be glad to do so. Otherwise I’ll spend my precious time debating REAL informed voters.

          14. InformedVoter September 6, 2016

            You obviously don’t like being bested. When I initially made the claim that Hillary told Chelsea that the attack was caused by a premeditated crowd, you claimed that I was lying and that no such email from Hillary existed. It was a real shock to you wasn’t it. You’ve never recovered from that. You can’t handle the truth.

            The Hillary lead has disappeared.

          15. Jenn September 6, 2016

            Bested? Are you kidding me? You mean I’ve been talking to a child all this time? Wow, that explains everything. Your mind hasn’t matured yet. These forums are for people to voice their opinion. I cannot best you and you cannot best me when it comes to our opinions because we both have one. Facts are different. When you claim something to be a fact, you should be able to back it up with proof. With all your talking points, you haven’t shown me one piece of evidence to back up your statements. Why? Because it’s not fact, its your opinion. If you show me this email then you have bested me. If you can do that, I will gladly admit to being wrong because that’s what sensible adults do and I don’t live in denial. You are a liar, plain and simple. I never said Hillary didn’t send an email to Chelsea. What I said was she never sent an email saying she was going to LIE AND SAY IT WAS A VIDEO. You LIED when you said that email existed but you can’t send me the link when I’ve asked you repeatedly to send it. I’m too busy with life to continue this nonsense conversation over something that doesn’t exist. Supply that email or give up on your lie. Don’t live in denial, it’s not healthy and please, Grow up!

          16. InformedVoter September 6, 2016

            OMG. When I made the statement that Hillary sent Chelsea an email identifying that the attack was premeditated your response was that “no such email was sent by Hillary” I provided proof and only then did you backtrack and admit that Hillary sent Chelsea an email. You still denied that the email said the attack was premeditated. You also claimed that Hillary’s email said it was because of the video. When further proof was provided, you once more changed your stance. OK, I get it. You’re a female and as such, you’re permitted to change your mind, lie, hold your breath and scream and slap and the world is supposed to accept that. So how do you think Putin will respond to Hillary when she threatens to hold her breath (oh I forgot, with all her coughing, she can’t hold her breath)? I think it’s ironic that the media and Hillary talk about Trump being in Putin’s pocket. The opposite is true … Putin has Hillary’s emails and will use them to blackmail her. Putin also has Obama’s real birth certificate and will produce it to destroy Obama. Why do you think Putin has gotten everything he wanted? Yet the media say Putin wants Trump president, but he’ll have so much more leverage against Clinton.
            I suspect you didn’t know anything about what was just posted, but why would I not be surprised. You denied that Hillary sent Chelsea an email.

          17. Jenn September 7, 2016

            What is wrong with you? You lie so much you can’t even keep
            track of your own lies. First you said Hillary sent the email saying she would claim the attack was caused by a video. Now you’re saying Hillary sent Chelsea an email identifying that the attack was premeditated. If your mommy hasn’t
            placed parental controls on your computer, go back and read the post you sent just 13 days ago. It states and I quote “I don’t know why low information folks like you continue to provide “proof” for you point, but in reality, your “proof” ends up proving my point. I claimed that Hillary sent her daughter an email on the night of the attack and Hillary said they were going to claim it was caused by a video”. Make up your mind, what story are you going with? I absolutely refuse to discuss this email with you again because it doesn’t exist and you know it. That’s why you haven’t been able to show it to me.

            You’ve made our morning. I was drinking my coffee while
            reading your post and I began to choke on your birther comments which brought some of my concerned co-workers over to check on me. Now I know what’s wrong with you. You’re living in that alternate universe. I bet you think the president is gay, Michelle is a man, and their children aren’t really theirs. Where is Elvis hiding? My assistant is a fan and would like to see him. Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! You’re a joke. My office employees still can’t stop laughing at you. They want me to keep responding to you because you give us our morning funnies. Look into the light, take my hand and step out of the twilight zone and back into the real world. President Obama hasn’t turned over the country to the Black Panthers, he’s not running for a third term, there are no death panels, and we are not living under Sharia law. It’s safe for you to return to the real world. I know people like you can’t handle the fact that President Obama is your president, twice beating your party by a landslide. Claiming he’s not born here does not de-legitimize his presidency, it only helps you sleep at night if you can believe he’s not your legitimate president. By the way, Trump had “his people” looking into the birth certificate back in 2012. He had proof, remember? Where is it? Oh, it’s in the same place your Hillary email is, in the Twilight Zone. Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha!

          18. InformedVoter September 7, 2016

            It’s ironic that my colleagues wonder what you’ve been smoking. You also stated something about this being a game. You bet it’s a game. Obama and Hillary, worried about the upcoming election, proudly announce that ISIS is being defeated and then Benghazi occurs. Gasp! So they play the game, they decide to blame it on the video (debunked over and over), but Hillary decided to inform family and friends of the truth – premeditated attack. During the hearings, this was hammered home and Hillary made her famous “what difference” statement. So, yes, it’s a game and the reason it’s so important is that your have a President and SOS lying to the public for political and personal gain. This is just like the game they’re playing with jobless numbers. In early 2010 with the economy in the tank, Obama wanted to stop the eventual beating he took in the elections. So they played the game of changing the metrics. They continue to report the altered numbers even today. Look at the beating he took in 2014. Talk about landslide losses! The Dems lost more local, state and federal seats than any party ever! And just to give you and your coffee clutch circle something to swallow (or choke on), here are the true jobless numbers.
            So Hillary admitting that she lied to the public and told her daughter (via emails) the truth, is not good enough proof? It’s comforting to know you have such a low faith level in Hillary.

          19. Jenn September 7, 2016

            Tell your colleagues I smoke only the best! My employees think I should share some with you because it may give you the courage to exit the twilight zone. It’s not anything new that the party in power loses midterm elections but the Dems still won 1.17 million more votes in 2012. It’s called gerrymandering, the only way republicans kept control of the house and senate. You can look that little fact up. Even with all the crap your party threw at the president, he still won handily in both elections and that was great. Dems don’t turn out in midterms like the general so its not surprising they lost seats. Repubs were in control from 2000 to 2008. The economy was destroyed, over 800,000 job losses every month, 2 non-paid for wars, housing market in shambles and that is just a few of the ways your party destroyed the country. Speaking of lies, we have over 5,000 dead American men and women from a war that was based on known lies about WMD’s and mushroom clouds. But you and your party don’t care about those lies or all of those lives that were lost. You pretend to care about the four lives lost in Benghazi but you don’t, you just play the blame game which is pathetic. There was no ISIS until your party decided they could make more money by going into Iraq and further destabilized the Middle East. Oh yeah, and they couldn’t even find Osama Bin Laden and destroy him in the process. Chalk up another Obama success! Typical mess made by republicans and the democrats always have to come in and clean it up. Under democratic presidents, our country has always done better. You can look that up too.

          20. InformedVoter September 7, 2016

            The liberal MSM has kept the public from hearing about how terrible Obama has been. Even his meager successes have been blown out of proportion.
            Did you see the final issue of Newsweek? They decided to come clean and tell the public that they’ve been protecting Obama, even to the point of lying or tainting facts. The jobless rate, deportation numbers, just about everything you folks like to claim are good news, have now been revealed to be false!
            I’ve sent this to several of your fellow posters and they just can’t believe that the media would have lied to protect Obama.
            This should be interesting reading for your coffee club.

            NEWSWEEK IS GOING OUT WITH A BANG!!! August 21 Issue
            You might find this interesting reading……..

            Newsweek Closed Its Doors with a Slam at Obama
            Newsweek Is Now History. The liberal Newsweek Magazine is going out of business, but not before it attacks the President. This is quite an article, even more so when you consider that NEWSWEEK finally had the guts to admit it. WOW! Newsweek COVER!!! It is their last cover before they fold. Also read the article at the end. AMAZING!!!
            Finally, Matt Patterson and Newsweek speak out about Obama. This is timely and tough. As many of you know, Newsweek has a reputation for being extremely liberal. The fact that their editor saw fit to print the following article about Obama and the one that appears in the latest Newsweek, makes this a truly amazing event, and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our President and his Agenda are starting to trickle through the protective wall built around him by the liberal media…

            By Matt Patterson
            (Newsweek Columnist — Opinion Writer)
            Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world’s largest economy, direct the world’s most powerful military, execute the world’s most consequential job?
            Imagine a future historian examining Obama’s pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a “community organizer;” a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, less often did he vote “present”); and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.
            He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama’s “spiritual mentor;” a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama’s colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president? There is no evidence that he ever attended or worked for any university or that he ever sat for the Illinois bar. We have no documentation for any of his claims. He may well be the greatest hoax in history.Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day.
            But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were ‘a bit’ extreme, he was given a pass. Let that Sink in: Obama was given a pass – held to a lower standard because of the color of his skin. Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) “non-threatening,” all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest? Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon – affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves. Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back.
            Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don’t care if these minority students fail; liberals aren’t around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin – that’s affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn’t racism, then nothing is. And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois ; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.
            What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama’s oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people – conservatives included – ought now to be deeply embarrassed. The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of cliches, and that’s when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth – it’s all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years. (An example is his 2012 campaign speeches which are almost word for word his 2008 speeches)
            And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. Remember, he wanted the job, campaigned for the task. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerless-ness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. (The other day he actually came out and said no one could have done anything to get our economy and country back on track). But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?
            In short: our president is a small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such an impostor in the Oval Office.
            P.S. Please send this article to family and friends throughout America and ask them to read and distribute this article to others.

          21. Jenn September 7, 2016

            Once again “informed voter”, let me explain to you what is
            happening outside of the twilight zone. The article you are so excited about was written by Matt Patterson in 2011 for the conservative opinion website, The American Thinker. It was also published in the Washington Post. The Newsweek
            article was written before the election in 2012 by Niall Ferguson and was titled “Hit the Road Barack”. He is a conservative historian who worked for John McCain’s pitiful campaign in 2008, the same one who gave us Sarah (brainless) Palin, (ouch) I can see why he’s angry. Newsweek had published a scathing cover story on Mitt Romney so they decided to publish a diversity of opinion. According to Michael Tomasky, he said “We should cultivate and cater to
            republican readers as well as democratic ones.” That is why they ran that article. The November 2012 Newsweek cover shows a victorious President Obama in a Napoleon jacket with the headlines, GOP: You’re Old, You’re White, You’re History! The Obama Conquest, Lucky General or Master of the Game. Newsweek ended its print publication in December 2012 and returned to print at the end of 2013.

            As usual, a conservative website, The Trumpville Report and
            others, regurgitated this article and passed it off like a new article to misinformed conspiracy theorists like you and you sucked it up like a Slurpee. See what happens when you live in an alternate universe, you look like a fool to those of us who actually listen and read legitimate news sources, books, and magazines, those of us who actually educate ourselves on the issues. I don’t just go with what I like to hear and what makes me feel good but I listen to many voices from both sides, then I research the sources to make sure it’s based on fact not opinion. You should try it so you don’t make yourself look stupid.

            Here are just a few facts for you to chew on regarding the
            accomplishments of this president. Conservatives can write all the articles they want voicing their opinions about how bad this president has been but the facts speak for themselves and cannot be denied whether you like it or not:

            1.) Averted a major financial crisis
            2.) Saved the auto industry
            3.) Doubled stock market
            4.) Cut the deficit two-thirds
            5.) Unemployment rate at 5%
            6.) Insured over 20 million people
            7.) Captured and killed Osama Bin Laden
            8.) Reached nuclear deal with Iran
            9.) Ended Don’t Ask Don’t Tell
            10.) Brought the majority of our troops home from Iraq and

            I could list more but I don’t have time. He accomplished
            these things without any help from the republican party. Give me one accomplishment from the republican party. What have they done over the last 8 years? Nothing!! They were hell bent on making him a one-term president, destroying him and any legacy he would have that they refused to work with him on
            anything, even things they normally are for like creating jobs by fixing our infrastructure. In the process of trying to destroy President Obama, they destroyed the party of Lincoln. It is now the party of Trump. God help your party, he’s the only one who can.

          22. InformedVoter September 8, 2016

            Of course the article was a reprint. That does not alter the message.
            There are some major issues with your “accomplishment” list. Many are not considered to be accomplishments and many others items are flat out wrong.
            The easy pickings are 6: prior to the ACA, 14% of the adult population was uninsured, now it’s 11%. 3% does not equal 20 million, and we didn’t net out all those who lost their insurance when they because part-time workers.
            Next is 5; the jobless rate is closer to 25%. In 2010 the Obama team changed the U3 and U6 metrics, in hopes to not lose so many of the seats they actually lost.
            Next is 2; now Chrysler is German and 70% of GMs cars are made in China, and all the tech services from the Tech Center in Michigan are now located in China. The $800 million is nothing compared to what we’ve lost. Without the bailout, Ford and the other car companies would have picked up the production that GM and Chrysler had. No, it was a relocation and selloff, it did not save the auto industry but cost us the auto industry.
            #9 at a cost that has destroyed the spirit of the military. All the military leaders said “don’t do it”. So we have no gays on the front line because if the Muslims capture one, they behead them. In forward units, you want your fellow troops to watch your back, not to watch your butt!
            I could continue and destroy the remainder as either being tremendous negatives to over 50% of the population or incorrect.
            Obama had total control for 2 years and all he passed, with dirty politics, was the ACA. With the double digit increases in premiums and the two major insurance companies pulling out next year, the ACA is doomed even if Hillary wins.
            Even film producer/director Michael Moore has called Obama’s legacy of being nothing more than being the first black elected and that he’s wasted 8 years.
            Finally, political experts have rated Obama as high as 18, but now he’s locked somewhere between 33 and 38. In the same crowd as GW, but ahead of Carter. These same experts had GW in the top 10 after two years. The liberal MSM constantly beat up GW and have resorted to lying to prop up Obama. Then they end up ranked the same. If the MSM had bolstered GW like they did with Obama, GW would certainly be ranked in the mid-20s. Your comment that the Congress worked against Obama is no different than GW having to work with Dems for his final years. Yet GW actually was productive and worked with the Dems, meanwhile Obama used his “pen and phone” and couldn’t even get his own party to support his agenda. Hillary got the nomination by distancing herself from Obama’s failed policies.
            Now that Trump has pulled ahead of Hillary in the major polls, even without the upcoming heavy bombardment ads that will soon air, it looks like the Dems will be left scratching their heads, just like they did in 2014.

          23. Bill P August 4, 2016

            Jenn this is typical of mis-informed voter, he finds things on ultra right wing media and passes them off as legitimate news stories. I read the Breitbart linked story and beside the Headline there is no proof of Khan donating money or of working with Saudi Arabia. Khan didn’t practice law at Hogan, Lowells he was the manager of litigation technology. Now he trying to pass off the same Shoebat link.

          24. Jenn August 4, 2016

            I’m just getting to know this guy. It’s so amazing how he really believes he’s informed and he’s supporting a guy who hasn’t given any of us any information about how he and “he alone” is going to make an already great country great. This morning he called me “naive” and an “low information person”. Unreal! I responded to him probably for the last time because I enjoy discussing issues with people who use logic, even those I may not agree with.

          25. Bill P August 5, 2016

            Jenn he does that with everyone who disagrees with his “misinformed” comments. He resorted to the “shoebat” link to show that Khan did what misinformed claimed. I told him that this site should be named “batshit.com” for all of its bogus rants.

          26. Jenn August 5, 2016

            As Lindsay Graham said, his party has gone “batshit crazy”. I find that the best way to handle people like him is to pound them with facts. The more you do, the more names they call you. That’s when you know they have nothing left.

          27. Bill P August 6, 2016

            You are quite correct on the fact issue. The more facts presented to the trolls the more they resort to name calling.

      5. Bill P August 2, 2016

        Why did you only pick a piece of her answer? The full answer is a bit different than what you are trying to imply. Here is the full answer:

        “Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night and decided they’d go kill some Americans,” Clinton said. “What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?” Not the same as you try imply what Hillary said.
        As for Mr. Khan where is the proof from a reliable source? As for Drumpf he lies about things he doesn’t need to. The NFL states they didn’t send a letter to him, he did say he talked directly and indirectly to Putin over a year before he sated he never talked to Putin, Drumpf stated he hand picked the teachers at Trump (not really a) University but recently said he never hired any teachers and I can go on and on. Misinformed or uniformed voter you constantly show your lack of knowledge about most things.

        1. dpaano August 2, 2016

          Trump changes his mind as often as he changes his underwear!!!

          1. toejam August 3, 2016

            Now we know what your hobby is.

          2. Bill P August 3, 2016

            Now a Trump spoke person claimed in an interview with Wolf Blitzer that Obama’s policy changes to the “rules of engagement” in Iraq that likely cost the soldier his life referring to the Khan son. I didn’t policies like that were retroactive, Khan was killed in 2004 around 5 years “before” President Obama took office. I know the trolls don’t like when GW Bush gets blamed for something but he was the president in 2004.

          3. dpaano August 3, 2016

            That’s the big problem…..the GOP refuses to put the blame where the blame lies! Both Reagan AND GWB are the presidents that put this country in the serious state that it was in when President Obama took over. It’s still not back to where it belongs, but we hope that, soon, once Hillary is on board…..this country will continue to grow and prosper as it always did before Reagan and GWB ruined it!

        2. InformedVoter August 3, 2016

          Hillary told the grieving families face to face, that it was the video that caused the attack. When she was challenged about why she LIED, her response “what …” is the same as telling the families DIRECTLY she didn’t care that she lied.
          Are you one of those is still think the video caused the attack? Many in your low information crowd (like dpaano – the racist and bigot; or independant1) still claim the video caused the attack. Even Hillary now admits the video had nothing to do with it.
          The Khan family has donated millions to the Clintons and their phony foundation. He statement was prepared to try and offset the damage that Hillary suffered when the Benghazi families told the nation that Hillary lied to them.

          For your information, the reason I refer to dpaano and jmprint as racist and bigot is that they decided to use the term “boy” to describe well-educated black conservative males. Racial slurs are totally unacceptable. If you agree that they were just having fun using that racial slur, then I can add your name to the racist and bigot list.

          1. Bill P August 3, 2016

            You don’t know what you are talking about. The “what does it matter” is part her reply to Senator Johnson’s question during a Senate hearing in January 2013. Here is the question and Hillary’s reply “Johnson: No, again, we were misled that there were supposedly protests and that something sprang out of that — an assault sprang out of that — and that was easily ascertained that that was not the fact, and the American people could have known that within days and they didn’t know that.

            Clinton: With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator.” As for being low information look in the mirror “misinformed” you totally ignore any facts that don’t make you case then you disappear.
            There is no proof that Khizr Khan donated “millions” to the Clintons and their foundation, once again your mouth is stating something it can’t back up with proof. Khan worked for a law firm Hogan, Lovells LLP, this firm represents Saudi Arabia in the US. Khan worked there from 2000 – 2007 as the firm’s manager of litigation technology. Khan didn’t “practice” law while working for Hogan, Lovells LLP. This is directly from a Breitbart article with a very misleading title that Khan had deep financial connections to Saudi Arabia, Clinton Foundation, etc. None of these accusations are validated in the body of the article.
            I didn’t see any racist comments by either dpaano or jmprint in this thread. If you are so incensed by racist comments why don’t you go after otto the goat who makes racist comments and attaches racist videos/pictures?

          2. InformedVoter August 3, 2016

            First, dpaano and jmprint used the racial slur during a forum about the RNC. They thought it was funny.
            Hillary sent Chelsea an email while the attack was still going and told her it was a premeditated attack but they were telling everyone it was the video. They sent Harris on the Sunday circuit to tell everyone it was the video. Hillary told the families face to face it was the video. Her comment “what difference ..” certainly was directed to the families as well as the investigation committee!
            Regarding Khan, check out this link. You low information crowd is pathetic.

          3. Bill P August 4, 2016

            What has dpaano and jmprint have to do with this thread? This is between you and I, they are not in this discussion. Once again you pull some fact backed up by nothing but your delude mind. Now Hillary’s comment was directed at the families, first you claimed she said it to the families, you shift your statements once the prior ones have been proven false.
            I read the link where in the article is it proven that Khan donated millions of dollars to the Clint0n Foundation? As for low information you are the really pathetic one for quoting unreliable and noted extreme right wing website.
            What is the next version of your story, your Breitbart link offers no proof of Khan doing anything wrong and your shoebat link should be named “batshit.com”.

          4. InformedVoter August 25, 2016

            You challenged why I called jmprint and dpaano “racist and bigot”. I explained why I use that description. Thus you entered them into this forum.
            Now that it’s been proven that Khan has donated $22 million to the Clintons and the Khans have ties to several terrorist organizations, once again Trump has been vetted and proven to be correct in his claim.
            Hillary lied face-to-face with the families of the Benghazi attacks, so how can say she didn’t tell them the video caused the attacks?
            Once more you prove yourself to be low information.

          5. Bill P August 26, 2016

            It took you 22 days to reply and you still haven’t shown why you called jmprint and dpaano rascist and bigot, Where is your proof.

            Your claim of “it has been proven that Khan donated $22 million to the Clintons” but never offer any “provable” facts after 22 days. Here is the truth – “The first and and most glaringly obvious problem with this narrative is that Khizr Khan didn’t ever work for the Hogan Lovells law firm. He was employed for seven years (from 2000-07) at the Washington, D.C., office of Hogan & Hartson, a U.S.-based firm that — three years after Khan left their employ — merged with the London-based international law firm Lovells to form Hogan Lovells in 2010. And Lovells (where Khan never worked) had an office in the Saudi Arabian capital of Riyadh” Khan spent seven years, from 2000 to 2007, in the Washington, D.C., office of then-Hogan & Hartson. He served as the firm’s manager of litigation technology. Although he did not practice law while at Hogan, Khan was well versed in understanding the American courts system.

            Once again , 22 days later, you make the same inaccurate claim that Hillary lied to the families of Benghazi when she issued the “What difference at this point does it make” to a Congressional hearing. She never made that statement to the families.
            Actually it’s you who is the low information person, you offer no provable facts or reference ultra right wing sources who distort the alleged facts. Check out some real sources before you write more drivel. Take your time, another month or so is fine.

          6. InformedVoter August 27, 2016

            As usual, you demonstrate you are low information. What does 22 days have to do with the truth? Nothing! jmprint referred to well-educated black males who are conservative, as “boy”, dpaano endorsed jmprint’s comment. Hence, both will from now on be referred to as “racist and bigot”. You prove they didn’t say it!
            Hillary lied directly to the face of the families of the Benghazi attack, telling them it was the video. This was after she emailed her daughter and told her they were spinning the video story. During the hearings, when she was pressed as to why she LIED about the video, Hillary made her infamous statement. Since she knew that the statement would become public knowledge, in essence she said it to the families. You can’t be that far up Hillary’s ass to think otherwise, Then again, you are low information.
            As to Khan, these past “22” have revealed he’s what Trump claimed he was. It has been revealed that Khan was paid to make his speech.
            This should shut you up, but knowing you’re such a low information person, you’ll just claim Hillary is great.
            Now that 11 extremely liberal newspapers are calling for Hillary to dismantle the Clinton Foundation because it’s crooked (isn’t that the name Trump used to describe her?), what are going to use to defend the foundation? That’s right, your low information intellect will permit you.

          7. Bill P August 27, 2016

            No dummy you made a claim and never offered any proof till today. When did they make these “alleged” claims, what dates, what thread? In this country the proof is the burden od the accuser not the accused.

            As for Khirz Khan your original claim was “Since it’s been proven that the Khan family has donated millions to the Clintons and that they are connected to several terrorists groups” The only thing you offered as proof was link to an article on “shoebat.com” an ultra right wing site. The article there had a headline accusing Khan of donating millions to the Clintons but the body of the article offered no proof to backup this bogus accusation. Now you are changing your claim to “Khan” was paid to make the speech not that he donated millions to the Clintons. The article you reference on Americanliberty website never mentions Khizr Khan getting paid to make the DNC speech. Do you even read the article you are referencing or do you have a comprehension capabilityissue? Also the article claims that Khan worked for Hogan Lovells, he never worked for “that” company he worked for Hogan & Hartson from 2000 – 2007.From Bloomberg.com “As of May 1, 2010, Hogan & Hartson LLP was acquired by Lovells LLP. Hogan & Hartson LLP provides legal advisory services.” Since he left Hogan & Hartson in 2007 he couldn’t have worked for Hogan & Lovells., Who revealed this “faux” claim that Khirz Khan was paid to make his DNC speech? Once again you make a bullshit claim that you try to backup with an article that has no mention of your claim. You keep quoting sources that have inaccurate data or don’t even mention your “bogus” claim. Take another month and try to find some valid proof before you show how uniformed and biased you are!

          8. InformedVoter August 27, 2016

            If I show you the forum, will you then also call them “racist and bigot”? I thought not. Your low information crowd only believes the links that spew the lies you wish to hear.
            I’m not changing my claim about the $22 million donation and still claim Khan was paid $25k to speak.
            Read the following and they crawl back into your cave of low information mushrooms.
            So, the Dems had to pay actors to fill up seats at their convention and now we learn they paid Khan??
            – Khan was paid $25,000 by the Clinton campaign to speak at the DNC.
            – the speech was not written by Mr. Khan, but by two campaign staffers.
            – the copy of the US Constitution that Mr. Khan held up was bought only two HOURS before his speech by a female staffer, to be used solely as a prop and Khan returned the book after speaking.
            – 5 Gold Star families turned down the opportunity to speak before Khan was contacted by the Clinton campaign.
            – All five families were paid $5,000 and signed a non disclosure.
            – Khan’s immigration law firm is in debt $1.7M and owes back taxes of upward $850,000 plus penalties.
            – CNN paid Khan over $100,000 to tell his “story” and repeated interviews across networks.
            – Khan was given a bonus of $175k by the DNC for his effort in the media.
            – The IRS has since put Khan’s tax file on a “hold” status.

            Is this guy going to claim this on his taxes?? And doesn’t this disgrace the memory of his son?? Talk about soulless

          9. Bill P August 29, 2016

            Remember the old Wendy’s commercial where the woman asked “where is the beef”? Well where is your provable facts to back up these allegations or as you like to state “it has been revealed…..” You make 10 claims yet offer no proof of your typical bullshit ranting. Once again you write nothing of value yet choose to denigrate a Gold Star parent. You are just another low class, low information right wing troll. By the way don’t try to pass off LexingtonLIbertarian as validation of your bullshit. All you did was copy and paste part of the article on this website. One more Einstein where did you or the writers of the Lexington article get their facts?
            Well you may not have changed your claim about the $22 million but you have never proved it. Khan never worked for Hogan & Lovells, the law firm with the Saudi Arabian government as a client. He left the firm of Hogan and Hartson in 2007. Lovells acquired Hogan & Hartson in 2010, that is 3 years after Khan left H & H. I did the math for you, didn’t want to overtax your addled little brain.
            As for “jmprint and dpaano” you still haven’t identified the thread that you say they made racist claims on. Show me their comments.
            You really should change your alias to misinformed or better yet uninformed.

          10. InformedVoter September 4, 2016

            I repeat my question to you “if I provide the post that shows jmprint and dpaano called well-educated conservative black males “boy” will you join with me in calling them “racist and bigot”? Since you will not, what purpose would be served to provide the proof. You will just deny it, but it is out there for many who have seen it.
            Once more you lie. You claim I didn’t provide proof that Khan has donated $22 million, etc. I DID provide proof. You say it’s not proof and supply vague and untrustworthy links to “prove” your point. Well, I say, your links are NOT proof and my links ARE proof. The fact that you lied by claiming that I didn’t provide proof completely destroys your credibility.
            I repeat my proven statements that Khan is a terrorist and has donated $22 million to the Clinton campaign and that he was paid to make his speech at the Dem convention. You have not and cannot prove otherwise.
            Low information you continue to prove yourself to be.

          11. Bill P September 5, 2016

            I have said all along that I asked you to show me proof of your statements made by jmprint and dpaano that you claim are racists? Your claim that ” Since you will not, what purpose would be served to provide the proof. You will just deny it, but it is out there for many who have seen it.” is typical of you. Write a comment but no proof is offered and now you are claiming that you know my answer before I have written it. Talk about be biased!
            You have never proven that Khizr Khan donated $22 million to the Clintons or their foundation. Your one link to “shoebat.com” claimed that Khan worked for Hogan & Lovells who had the Saudi Arabia government as a client and that they gave money to the Clinton Foundation. and so Khan was involved. The problem with the “shoebat” claim is that Khan never worked for that firm. As previously stated Khizr Khan worked Hogan and Harston from 2000 – 2007 and Hogan was acquired by Lovells in 2010, 3 years after Khan left Hogan & Hartson. Your shoebat article never mentions any $22 million donation by Khan. You can keep claiming that it has been revealed that Khan donated $22 million to the Clintons but you have “NOT” shown any proof of that.
            You can call me low information all you want but I don’t write lies.

          12. InformedVoter September 21, 2016

            It’s obvious that you’re in self-denial. When presented with the truth, you just say it’s a lie. Truth, that’s the word that liberals hate because they can’t handle the truth.
            I shall continue to refer to jmprint and dpaano as “racist and bigot” because of their slander of black males. I could care less if you believe me that they used that racial slur.

          13. Bill P September 22, 2016

            Once again you write a comment that has offered “NO” proof of your allegations. Tell me in what National Memo article jmprint and dpaano wrote a racist comment? It’s as simple as that, save your self denial bullshit for yourself. Whether you call them racist or not is meaningless. You are proving yourself to be just another troll who makes unfounded statements. I will await your reply in another few weeks.

          14. InformedVoter September 27, 2016

            I’ll repeat my statement for at least the third time … if I provide proof, will you then join me in calling them “racist and bigot”? If not, why should I take the effort? You claim my statements are unfounded, but in fact my statements are steeped in truth. So, unless you wish to man-up and vow to call them “racist and bigot”, then just take your juvenile personality back to the zit room and spend your time thinking of how you wished you had enough knowledge to post something of value.

          15. Bill P September 27, 2016

            You have a bit of illogical thought in this. You are asking me to make a decision before seeing the facts. Till you provide proof your statements are just your opinion. Take your idiotic man-up comment and stick it up your backed up butt. Provide the article stream where you claim the two made a racist statement or go away.

      6. Insinnergy August 2, 2016

        Let’s take a moment to dissect your latest word vomit just before I block you for being a bigoted moron:

        “Racist and bigot”
        – based on what??? The fact the Republican party is the Angry Dumb White Person Party?

        “So Hillary can tell the families from the Benghazi political action “what difference does it make?” ”
        – Laughably taken out of context by right wing conspiracy nut news outlets.
        The full quote is available from pretty much anywhere. Here’s a hint: It’s only bad if you make sure you snip just that single sentence out of everything she said. Congrats right wing frothing nutbag on fueling your outrage with nothing.

        “Stone’s comments are factual.”
        – Hahahahaha Stone has The Donald’s d**k so far down his throat I’m surprised he can breathe. The most casual search on Roger Stone shows him as a vigorous pustulant political bottom-feeder of the worst sort. Prepared to pump any bullsh!t that will fluff his candidates. The fact that you consider him truthful should disqualify you from any serious job or public responsibility. Certainly it makes me doubt your sanity.

        “Trump has been proven correct 100% of the time for making comments like illegal committing more crime, etc.”
        – Too stupid for rebuttal. Trump has contradicted HIMSELF in the same week, same speech, same paragraph, and same sentence, on regular occasions. The man’s mind is a sewer. He has a 9% truthful rating.
        The only way you could use “proven correct” with Trump is the same way a stopped clock is right twice a day… once you’ve said so much contradictory bulls!t, one or two things are bound to be right every once in a while. Alas… none of those things are to do with Immigrants. Fail.

        Alas… your Hannity approach of compacting ever more lies and mistruths into your posts until they overflow in numbers too great to rebut won’t really work here.

        “InformedVoter”… Ahahahahahahahahahahaha

        1. toejam August 3, 2016

          OMG blocked , How will informedvoter ever get to sleep at night??? Whoa is all!

          1. Insinnergy August 3, 2016

            I can’t see what you’re saying because I’ve long since blocked you as well… but let me take a wild guess:
            – faux surprise.
            – personal insult
            – diversion into some pet issue.

            That’s how you tools roll.
            Love to watch you wasting your time.
            Mwah 🙂

        2. InformedVoter August 3, 2016

          It’s been proven over and over that you are a member of the low information crowd. Thus, it’s not necessary for you to continue to provide proof.
          The “racist and bigot” name is applied to two posters (jmprint and dpaano). If you could actually understand what you read, you would clearly see it’s directed at these two. What did they do to deserve this title? Around the time the RNC started, they decided it would be fun to use the racial slur of “boy” when they referred to any well-educated black conservative male. The use of racial slurs is not acceptable. So if you think it was OK for them to use the racial slur, then you too will be known as a racist and bigot.
          Hillary certainly was telling the families “what difference does it make”. Just because she didn’t say it to their face does not mean that she didn’t feel that way. And what about the families she did tell to their face that the cause of the attack was the video. Many in your low information crowd still claim the video caused the attack. Are you one of those low information fools that think that?
          The Khan family has donated millions to the Clintons and their phony foundation. This was an orchestrated event to help offset the damage to Hillary that the Benghazi families inflicted.
          Trump has made many statements since announcing his run, and nearly 100% have been proven to be correct. Like his comment that illegal aliens commit many more crimes than the press acknowledges. The press attacked him when he made the comment. Withing 24 hours, dozens of organizations produced hard facts that illegal aliens commit more crimes, both violent and non-violent, than the rest of the population. And the dummy Khan, while holding a copy of the Sharia law, challenged Trump about the constitution. Why didn’t the press call Khan out on his support for having Sharia law in the US. And what about Khan making the claim that the president can’t block certain folks from entering the US? The president CERTAINLY does have that authority and it has been used more than once (by Democrat presidents).
          So once again, your comments have been shredded.
          Please let me know if you wish to join the racist and bigot crowd, we already know you’re a member of the low information crowd.

  3. zorro037 August 1, 2016

    This Republican Party is shameless and its leadership is spineless. How these people could expect to be respected bu their fellow Americans? Trump and his gang are a bunch of ignorant who believe this society should fall for whatever idiocy they say. I would like to say the very kind of things they say but I am incapable of that. Whenever i feel tempted I remember teaching of my mother: gentlemen do not trash other people even having reason to do so.

    1. toejam August 3, 2016

      Did your Mama really say that? I bet you just made that up right along with having a Mama.

      1. zorro037 August 3, 2016

        Yes, she said that; she was a very fine Souhthern Baptist woman. I am glad for her teachings.

  4. Aaron_of_Portsmouth August 1, 2016

    Trump continues his diseased and reckless descent into a hellish condition. He may very well have crossed that line of no-return without a way back. His toadies on the internet, and his advisers who are inured to the stench of Trump’s ill-mannered behavior, are more that willing to leap into that pit of no-return, where their “nostrils will be branded”, to use a colorful metaphor for what awaits “Kaffirs” ,as cited in the Qur’an.
    The GOP is locked in with Trump’s descent by virtue of an idiotic pledge–a pledge that would have required them to support Adolf Hitler or Stalin had either been selected as the nominee.

    “Kaffirs” come in all stripes: Jihadists who willfully corrupt and distort Islam, those outside the Ummah who choose to be belligerent in their opposition to Muhammad and to Islam, and those today in conservative circles, namely those who enjoy opposing Christianity by their words and deeds. For these groups, “branding of nostrils” will be invigorating compared to the reality behind that seemingly benign phrase.

    1. dpaano August 1, 2016

      Didn’t the bible say something about the antichrist coming soon…..I think he’s here and his name is Trump!!! I bet under that mess he calls hair is the mark of the beast! I bet the evangelicals haven’t thought of that one. Here’s a guy that wants to take this country into total chaos, wipe away years of foreign policy, and I could go on. If that isn’t the antichrist, then no one else is!!!

      1. Aaron_of_Portsmouth August 1, 2016

        Trump certainly is behaving in an anti-christ manner. Fortunately for Trump, the unfortunate label of “Anti-Christ” spoken of in the Bible was a family during the time of Muhammad—that family’s patriarch was named Umayyah. One of his descendants committed a dastardly deed in the year 666 AD on the plains of Karbila, north of Baghdad. Other members of Umayyah’s offspring committed acts as recorded in Revelations.

        But, the label “antichrist” can be generic and references anyone who stood in defiance of any of the Prophets.

        So, Nimrod might well be referred to as the “antichrist” of Abraham’s Dispensation; Pharoah might be considered the “antichrist” who rose up against Moses, etc.

        However, Trump is certainly acting in an antiChrist behavior by his callous disregard for Christian principles, its ideals, and its aspirations.

        It would have helped him if he ever took the time to read the Bible, or any book other than the “The Art of The Lie” (aka “The Art of The Deal”).

        Fare thee well.

        By the way, the question of the “Beast” was posed by some American Baha’i women in the early part of the 20th century when they traveled to what was then called Palestine, and asked many questions and requested explanations of certain Biblical and Islamic concepts and themes of Abdu’l Baha who resided there after having been released after the overthrow of the Ottoman Empire by ‘The Young Turks’. One of their requests was an explanation of the passage regarding “The Beast”. A book entitled “Some Answered Questions” is based on the questions raised by those insightful women—you’ll find it interesting.

        1. dpaano August 2, 2016

          Aaron, I’ll have to find the book and read it….you always have interesting things to say about Baha’i. I’ve never heard of this, but it sounds interesting.

          1. Aaron_of_Portsmouth August 2, 2016

            Thank you. Before reading, I would recommend a visit to http://www.bahai.org.

            The reason I write what I write is because of the urgency of the times and a realization that I must become aware of other people’s cultures and backgrounds, their religious experiences, and appreciate everyone’s uniqueness. This has been enhanced and cultivated as a result of becoming a Baha’i.

            Obviously I need improvement in being a Baha’i, as you’ll learn. There are Baha’is in your area quite likely.

            What I don’t appreciate(as you’ve already noticed) are pomposity, bigotry, misogyny, and intolerance. I feel a need to rebuke bigotry, firmly and politely( a challenge I admit).

            (“The Goat” and “AgLander” are proving to be excellent tools to better myself).


          2. toejam August 3, 2016

            What a pair of bigots you to are.

          3. Aaron_of_Portsmouth August 3, 2016

            Thanks “toejam” for your ignorant remark. May I suggest you learn to use a dictionary so that you might learn how to spell and to learn what the word “racist” means. Your lack of knowledge is astounding and explains your terse and 8th grade level remark.

            By the way, “toejam” fits you nicely.

          4. dpaano August 3, 2016

            You seem to have been taught the same things that my parents taught me…..everyone is unique and everyone should be viewed individually and NOT as a group. There are “good” and “bad” people in every group…..but in most cases, very few are of the latter! I will check out the website….it sounds like something that I could believe.

          5. toejam August 3, 2016

            What! There is something you have never heard about? That just could not be true.

        2. toejam August 3, 2016

          You and dippano are really into the supernatural. Do you fear for your sole?? You need to prey more like the beasts husband.

      2. toejam August 3, 2016

        The anti Christ, Woo!!! Just another supernatural believing nut case.

  5. Daniel Jones August 1, 2016

    It is not erroneous when Faux Noise lies flat out, it is malicious.
    Let’s get this straight, Faux Noise claims no other news outlet covered it? They’re basically telling their viewers that NO NEWS OUTLET is real, but that they are.
    That’s two horrific lies in one sentence.

    1. dpaano August 1, 2016

      They lie almost as much as Trump……it must be a RW trait for sure!

  6. Mama Bear August 1, 2016

    Getting anywhere near Trump is like getting into quicksand. His behaviour is so utterly predictable – like stepping into quicksand. What a snake.

    1. Aaron_of_Portsmouth August 1, 2016

      Trump is too bizarre a creature even for a role as an antagonist in “The Twilight Zone” or “Night Gallery”

  7. Dominick Vila August 1, 2016

    The best thing we could do,before we criticize other cultures, is learn something about those cultures or nationalities. The Khan family is from Pakistan, a country that had a female Prime Minister (Benazir Bhutto). Pakistani women have more than a voice, that have wielded power that has eluded us thus far.

    1. dpaano August 1, 2016

      So much for Trump’s knowledge of foreign policy! That alone scares the bejeezus out of me! This is the man who wants to run this country……sure, run it into the ground! His total lack of knowledge about how this country actually functions or what our foreign policy is makes me nervous!!

      1. loveofcountry August 1, 2016

        And our other choice is a woman who will do or say anything to get elected. A disgrace how she lied to the grieving parents of the soilders killed in Benghazi, state emails that she stored on a server in her bathroom and on and on and on.
        What a mess.

        1. Catherine Bouey August 1, 2016

          “And our other choice is a woman who will do or say anything to get elected”.

          But it’s okay when the racist, sexist, narcissistic, islamaphobe, who refuses to release his taxes says anything to get elected?

          “A disgrace how she lied to the grieving parents of the soilders killed in Benghazi,”

          That was no more disgraceful than you mistaking our diplomats for Soldiers.

          1. loveofcountry August 2, 2016

            Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, former Navy Seals who
            we’re in Benghazi, went against the stand down order and alone defended the US consulate in Benghazi. Chris Stevens asked for additional security to the consulate prior to the attacks. No security was given. Hillary Clinton told the American people that a video was responsible for the attack. Hillary told her daughter a different story which was the truth. That it was not a spontaneous attack. She was lying or was still suffering from her head injury.

          2. Catherine Bouey August 2, 2016

            “Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, former Navy Seals who
            we’re in
            Benghazi, went against the stand down order and alone defended the US
            consulate in Benghazi”.

            Interesting you mention this yet the people leading the which hunt on Benghazi haven’t mentioned these people. This also doesn’t take away from my original point everyone mentions the 4 diplomats that were killed no says anything about these soldiers you mentioned.

            “No security was given”.

            There would’ve been security at the consulate before hand if our republican congress hadn’t slashed the State Department’s budget that could’ve been used to protect Stevens and the others months prior to the attack you seem to either be unaware of or have forgotten this fact much like the Republicans leading the witch hunt on Benghazi..

            “Hillary Clinton told the American people that a video was responsible for the attack”.

            Actually that was Susan Rice and this was the initial assumption also if we’re going to complain about people saying something one minute then changing their mind the next I love to hear your thoughts on Bush’s rhetoric and actions regarding Iraq. Where he went from threatening Military action if Saddam had WMD’s to threatening military action if Saddam didn’t stand down after no WMD’s were found.

            “Hillary told her daughter a different story which was the truth”.

            Why would she need to tell her daughter who wasn’t a state department official the truth about what happened?

            “She was lying or was still suffering from her head injury”.

            No different than you lying or suffering from a brain injury incurred from wearing your tinfoil hat to tight except yours seems to be a much more legitimate case.

          3. dpaano August 2, 2016

            Also, the Ambassador who was visiting Benghazi did not want extra security. He went there for a meeting with a high-ranking individual in Benghazi, and he refused additional security when asked. So, whatever security was available at the Consulate was pretty much all that was there to defend it. Any other security was miles away and couldn’t get there in time to do much of anything after the first attack!!

          4. Catherine Bouey August 2, 2016

            You keep your insightful and sound arguments out of this. And let the conspiracy babies have their rattle.

          5. dpaano August 3, 2016

            I think they didn’t get their naps today……maybe their mommies need to give them a bottle and put them down for the afternoon!

          6. dpaano August 2, 2016

            Unfortunately, there was NEVER a stand down order, but you can believe whatever you’ve been led to believe with all the conspiracy theories! It has been proven time and time again that no such order existed. The main reason why they couldn’t get to Benghazi on time is because they were not prepared to move at a moment’s notice and they were too far away to be able to get there in time to do anything. When they DID arrive, it was much too late. Also, again, the first news that came out of Benghazi DID state that the video was the reason for the first attack….this has been proven and attested to by the ringleader of the attack. Later, Islam activists stepped in and used the first attack as a reason to further attack the consulate. This wasn’t found out until later AFTER Secretary Clinton had talked with the families of the soldiers who were killed. There were NO lies told no matter what you seem to believe! Maybe you need to do more homework….either that, or maybe you can get your mommy to give you a cookie and put you down for a nap!

          7. loveofcountry August 2, 2016

            Why the insults?

          8. toejam August 3, 2016

            That’s all she knows how to do. Unless independent1 tells her different.

          9. Independent1 August 2, 2016

            And more lies just keep rolling off your fingers!! You realize no sane poster here believes a word you are posting!!

            Even Fox News admits that NO STAND DOWN ORDER WAS EVER GIVEN

            From Fox News:

            No stand down order or military missteps in Benghazi attack, GOP-controlled intel panel finds

            The report alleges no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.

            WASHINGTON – A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that
            the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi, Libya.

            Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies surrounding the incident, the report concludes that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.


          10. loveofcountry August 2, 2016

            I guess I just choose to believe the six military contractors who were there at the CIA compound ready to go and were told to stand down. Why would they lie?

          11. Independent1 August 2, 2016


          12. loveofcountry August 2, 2016

            The names of the courageous men who defied the stand down order were:
            John Tiegen, Kris Paronto, Mark Geist. They are the men who said they were told to stand down. They also said that they did not receive the back up that they requested. And yes security was inadequate in Benghazi. Four American died. Also, why were our Diplomats in a rented villa and not in a secured compound.

          13. toejam August 3, 2016

            You are dealing with a simpleton Who gets his marching orders from the sexual predators wife.

          14. GodBlessRealAmerica! August 2, 2016

            You will do nothing sissy! You are a propa https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9e5438480a77621ae44e661eb8ff6a205e1396ab5d65bdf919c26ac9b1faafdd.jpg gandist liberal liar! Yes you are!

          15. toejam August 3, 2016

            You claim to know so much you must be an insider. Hillary may drink some clear lax and you will be down the tubes.

          16. GodBlessRealAmerica! August 3, 2016


        2. Independent1 August 1, 2016

          In case you’re not aware, the ring leader of the Benghazi attack has said that the primary reason for the attack on the consulate was in revenge for the video. And there were two attacks that day: one in the afternoon and one later on where part of the attackers came back to finish the job which started a bit later than 9pm that night .

          So the intelligence changed during the day and over night, and Hillary DID NOT LIE ABOUT ANYTHING; she reported to the families of those who died WHAT HAD BEEN REPORTED TO HER FROM THOSE ENDURING THE ATTACK IN BENGHAZI AT THE TIME SHE SPOKE WITH THE VICTIMS’ FAMILIES.

          And at that time it was the feeling of those in Benghazi that the attack was motivated by revenge for the video; and then as it happened, it was found out that those who were actually engaged in the attack, were associated with a splinter group related to al Qaeda so suddenly the thought changed that it was also motivated by established terrorists – A FACT THAT HAS NEVER BEEN PROVED!!!

          And by the way – the email server that Hillary used WAS FAR MORE SECURE THAN ANY GOVERNMENT SERVER!! GOVERNMENT SERVERS ARE CONSTANTLY HACKED- THE SERVER HILLARY USED HAS NEVER BEEN HACKED. GOVERNMENT SERVERS ARE NOTORIOUSLY UNRELIABLE AND NOT SAFE FOR ANYTHING!! LOOK HOW MUCH INFO FROM GOVERNMENT SERVERS HAS BEEN LEAKED AROUND THE WORLD!!!! And don’t forget all the missing emails from Lois Lerner of the IRS that Darrell Issa was so frustrated over (another government server mishap).

          Just like the fake IRS Scandal, and the fake Benghazi Scandal – THE HOOPLA OVER HILLARY USING A NON GOVERNMENT SERVER IS ALSO A FAKE SCANDAL OVER NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!

          For your information – the Bush White House used the Republican National Committee’s email servers (non government servers) for 85% of all the government business they did for at least 6 years – so President Bush, VP Cheney, Karl Rove, Condi Rice, Collin Powell and 17 other Bush Administration people did far worse than Hillary by constantly using non government servers (RNC servers that were far more prone to being hacked than Hillary’s) to discuss all sorts of CLASSIFIED INFORMATION!! Information THAT THEY KNEW VERY WELL WAS CLASSIFIED!! AND THERE ARE STILL AROUND 80 MILLION EMAILS FROM THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION THAT ARE MISSING!!!!!!!!!

          1. loveofcountry August 2, 2016

            And we are to believe the ring leader of the Benghazi attack? If everthing was on the up and up with Hillary’s emails why deleat 30,000 of them. I hear this honest Beghazi terrorist is not in jail. Can this be true. James Comey said Hillary was untruthful.

          2. Independent1 August 2, 2016

            Sorry there dumbdumg, but the leader is in jail!! And just keep up with the pathological lies and attempts to fabricate reality.


          3. loveofcountry August 2, 2016

            You just disqualified yourself from any rational conversation.

          4. dpaano August 2, 2016

            You, on the other hand, were NEVER qualified!

          5. Independent1 August 2, 2016

            In your mentally demented mind, sure!! Since all you believe are pathological lies, anyone who posts facts just boggles your ignorant mind!!

            And if you’d like to stop conversing on the NM, we’d be more than happy if you’d just GO AWAY!!! BYE!!!

          6. toejam August 3, 2016

            He has never been rational, just likes to hear himself talk.

          7. Insinnergy August 2, 2016

            Meh, blocked.
            You’re far too far gone to bother arguing with.

            Basically if you still believe in Benghazi after 8 investigations, including the one that was admitted to just be for ruining Hillary’s presidential campaign, then either you’re too stupid to post here, or you’re a paid Astroturfer.

            I’d bet the latter. What a sad job.

            See you round, ethically bankrupt guy.

          8. toejam August 3, 2016

            Can’t handle the heat dip stick.

          9. dpaano August 3, 2016

            I’ve blocked several of these people……they can’t seem to carry on a serious, insightful, true discussion and only rant and rave (much like their buddy, Trump) rather than have anything intelligent to say!! Total waste of time for most of us on this website and not worth reading!

          10. dpaano August 2, 2016

            Again, you can tell these people over and over again, but they will never believe you…..they will ONLY believe what they’re told to believe. You can lead them around by the nose! I find it totally useless to try to give them facts because they don’t believe in facts unless the so-called “facts” are fed to them by the GOP!

          11. toejam August 3, 2016

            You sound like you get your facts from independent1 and he gets his from the DNC.

          12. loveofcountry August 2, 2016

            Sorry, you lost me at the ring leader of the attack said it was because if a video. Yes I am sure he is very trustworthy.

          13. toejam August 3, 2016

            Are you and Hillary related you lie almost better than her.

        3. Independent1 August 1, 2016

          And Hillary(50% truthful) is BY FAR the more honest candidate than Donald Trump(9% truthful), or Ted Cruz(22% truthful) or even Marco Rubio(similar to Cruz), and is even a little more honest than Bernie Sanders(49% truthful):

          From the NYTimes:

          One basic test of a politician’s honesty is whether that person tells the truth when on the campaign trail, and by that standard Clinton does well. PolitiFact, the Pulitzer Prize-winning fact-checking site, found 50 percent of the Clinton statements it examined to be either true or mostly true.

          That compares to 49 percent for Bernie Sanders’s, 9 percent for Trump’s, 22 percent for Ted Cruz’s and 52 percent for John Kasich’s. Here we have a rare metric of integrity among candidates, and it suggests that contrary to popular impressions, Clinton is relatively honest — by politician standards.


          (And the only reason Kasich rates as high as he does is because he’s really not been given that much exposure and had to respond to that many different issues. Because Kasich is every bit the biggot, misogynist and pathological liar of the ilk of Cruz and Rubio.; he’s a typical pathological lying Republican politician. (The fact that Ohio ranks as the 2nd most miserable state in America to live in with the 2nd worst quality of life – proves Kasich is no wonderboy.))

          1. loveofcountry August 2, 2016

            The Wasington Post, just gave Hillary four Pinocchio’s (highest untruthful rating) for her recent interview talking about Benghazi and her email scandal.

          2. Independent1 August 2, 2016

            Who at the WAPO, one of the right-wing nutcases like Rubin or Krauthammer or Will and on and on??? Sorry, the WAPO can be as big of pathological liars as Faux News!!!

          3. dpaano August 2, 2016

            WAPO is owned by the RW, much like FAUX News! What can you expect from them? I don’t even look at the Washington Post because of it’s stance!!

          4. dpaano August 3, 2016

            I just read that Trump has banned WAPO and NYTimes from any of his rallies…..interesting! Apparently, if you report the news, and if it doesn’t say “nice” things about Trump, he just willy nilly bans them. Has he heard about “Freedom of Speech,” or is that another item that he’s going to try to do away with if he’s ever in the White House (which will never happen)!

          5. loveofcountry August 2, 2016

            Article for Wasington Post written by liberal Glen Kessler. Also FYI
            Atlantic Magazine has a good article written by Ron Fournier called “Why can’t Hillary Clinton stop Lying.” I believe he is a liberal also.

          6. dpaano August 2, 2016

            Big deal!!! How many have they given Trump in the past several months?

          7. Insinnergy August 2, 2016

            Yep you just keep cherry picking the very few things available to your callow and vapid argument…. and avoiding the point:

            Trump: 9% truthful.


            Are you a moron?

          8. toejam August 3, 2016

            You two must be related.

          9. dpaano August 2, 2016

            The last time I checked with Politifact, it showed that Trump had lied 59% of the time vs. Hillary’s 12%. Can’t understand why these dunces keep insisting that she lies…..every time Trump opens his mouth, he lies! I don’t know if he even knows the difference between truth and lies! Apparently, if it sounds good to him and makes him look good, then it must be the truth! But, when he’s found out…..he ends up back pedaling faster than a Arizona roadrunner!

          10. toejam August 3, 2016

            Has Hillary been giving you lesson on how to lie? You are a good student.

        4. Independent1 August 1, 2016

          For such a terrible woman, Hillary sure has done an enormous amount of good around the world – especially for women:

          Some excerpts from the 2012 Women in the World Conference chaired by Meryl Streep:

          But that night in the theater two years ago, the other six brave
          women came up on the stage. Anabella De Leon of Guatemala pointed to Hillary Clinton, who was sitting right in the front row, and said, “I met her and my life changed.” And all weekend long, women from all over the world said the same thing:

          “I’m alive because she came to my village, put her arm around me, and had a photograph taken together.”

          “I’m alive because she went on our local TV and talked about my work, and now they’re afraid to kill me.”

          “I’m alive because she came to my country and she talked to our leaders, because I heard her speak, because I read about her.”

          She’s just been busy working, doing it, making those words “Women’s Rights are Human Rights” into something every leader in every country now knows is a linchpin of American policy. It’s just so much more than a rhetorical triumph. We’re talking about what happened in the real world, the institutional change that was a result of that stand she took.

          Everywhere she goes, she meets with the head of state and she meets with the women leaders of grassroots organizations in each country. This goes automatically on her schedule. As you’ve seen, when she went to Burma – our first government trip there in 40 years. She met with its dictator and then she met with Aung San Suu Kyi, the woman he kept under detention for 15 years, the leader of Burma’s pro-democracy movement. This isn’t just symbolism. It’s how you change the world.


          1. dpaano August 2, 2016

            Unfortunately, Independent1, the Trumpsters only believe the conspiracy theories, lies, and ridiculous comments that they’ve been brainwashed to believe by the Republican Party, who only uses lies and scare tactics to motivate their base! Apparently, it’s working on some of them because they post on this website, sounding like total idiots!

          2. GodBlessRealAmerica! August 3, 2016

            Crooked lying Hillary!!!

        5. dpaano August 2, 2016

          And how did she “lie to grieving parents?” As for the alleged “state e-mails” stored on her server, that bird has flown!! She’s been found to be not guilty. You need to try to find something of substance to blame on her instead of using “old” news that has been adjudicated long ago!!! As for lies, apparently, Trump can say anything he wants to get elected, but I guess that doesn’t seem to bother you Trumpsters! Every time he opens his mouth, he ends up having to spend days trying to back pedal from his ridiculous remarks!!! So far, he’s alienated the Muslims, the African Americans, Christians (the REAL ones), Latinos, Veterans, the Military, and a host of even Republicans who have refused to donate to his campaign…..even the Koch’s have seen the light and refuse to deal with him!! Talk about a mess….he’s the biggest one!

          1. loveofcountry August 2, 2016

            Such animosity! You speak of real Christians. Real Christians could never vote for Hillary who believes in abortion at any point in the life of an unborn child.

          2. dpaano August 3, 2016

            I’m a “real” Christian and I (and my fellow church members) ALL agree that the abortion question should be left up to the mother, the father, and the family doctor……NOT our government! If you men would just stay out of our private parts, things would work out much better! There are so many OTHER problems that need to be fixed in this country….not sure why this has become such a big deal to a bunch of old men!

          3. loveofcountry August 3, 2016

            Thou shall not kill.

          4. Independent1 August 3, 2016

            Right!! So why are you idiot Conservatives working to increase abortions and women dying because of failed abortions??

            13 of the 15 states in America with the highest rates of not only infant mortality, but maternal mortality also (women dying in child birth) ARE YOU GUESSED IT – GOP-RUN STATES!!!!

          5. toejam August 3, 2016

            You are the one doing all the guessing.

          6. toejam August 3, 2016

            You must remember she is military trained. Trained to use a fly swatter. I bet she was in military intelligence. Look up oxymoron and their she is, big as life. Never mind forget the oxy part.

          7. loveofcountry August 3, 2016

            What church could there possibly be were “all” of it’s members condone abortion? Thou shall not kill.

          8. Independent1 August 3, 2016

            Conservatives are bigger killers of fetuses and women dying by failed abortions than liberals; because they shut down legal/safe abortion clinics such that more abortions actually happen.

            Despite what you dummkopfs think, Planned Parenthood talks thousands of women each year OUT OF HAVING AN ABORTION!!! WHEN IDIOTS LIKE CONSERVATIVES WORK TO SHUT DOWN PP CLINICS, THEY’RE ENSURING THAT MORE ABORTIONS WILL HAPPEN!!!

            Only idiots like conservatives are stupid enough to believe that shutting down clinics and claiming abortions aren’t legal actually ends up with fewer women having abortions – when studies prove that the opposite is true MORE ABORTIONS HAPPEN WHERE ABORTIONS ARE ILLEGAL AND THERE ARE FEWER SAFE ABORTION CLINICS!!!!

          9. toejam August 3, 2016

            You are stuck in cap lock again. You need to clean your keyboard after your porn hub romances.

          10. toejam August 3, 2016

            Her church of course. The church of our lady of perpetual nonsense and dingle berry harvesting..

          11. loveofcountry August 3, 2016

            What church is there where ALL it’s members condone abortion?
            Thou shall not kill.
            What makes you think I
            am a man?

          12. Independent1 August 3, 2016

            Problem is lowlife, that banning abortions the way the GOP is doing and you support ACTUALLY INCREASES ABORTIONS AND DOESN’T REDUCE THEM.





          13. toejam August 3, 2016

            You seem to be an expert on everything except thinking.

          14. toejam August 3, 2016

            I have doubts you are a real person. Christian, who are you trying to scam?

          15. toejam August 3, 2016

            You are a disgrace to your country.

          16. InformedVoter August 3, 2016

            If you notice, I keep addressing dpaano as “hello racist and bigot”. The reason is that she and jmprint started calling well-educated black conservative males as “boy”. This of course is a racial slur so every time send them messages, I start with the greeting “hello racist and bigot”. As to dpaano, she got to where she is because of affirmative action. Her stint in “law enforcement” was that of a mall cop. I used to refer to her as Paul Blart wannabee. Keep jabbing them, they’re too low information to realize how foolish they look.

          17. toejam August 3, 2016

            Dippano is a third class dingle berry. My wife got her first job through affirmative action the difference is she became

            VP of a major oil co. Dippano became skilled at trough feeding. If she is an example of our military we are doomed.

          18. dpaano August 3, 2016

            Gosh, I served this country in the military for over 23+ years, but I’m a disgrace? Seriously?? Do you even know who you’re talking to or do you just say what you want because you can’t respond any other way? How old are you, by the way? Didn’t you get your nap today?

          19. toejam August 3, 2016

            You spent 23 years serving breakfast and washing pots what did you do the rest of the time? You are so lame. I have to give you credit for learning to feed out of the government trough. Have you ever had a real job?? My wife’s aunt is a retired colonel how far did you make it?? Never mind its my nap time.

          20. InformedVoter August 3, 2016

            Hello racist and bigot. Hillary said directly to the families that the video caused the attack. Even Hillary has admitted that the video did not cause the attack. How can you say she didn’t lie? We already know you are low information and attained what little you have because you got there only because of affirmative action and didn’t truly earn it. If it had been anyone but Hillary, they would have been indicted. When Trump wins, Hillary will be charged.

          21. GodBlessRealAmerica! August 3, 2016

            Get on Hillary’s bike hahahhahahaa

        6. Insinnergy August 2, 2016

          Congrats on an epic false equivalence.

          Sure.. the ex-Senator, ex-StateSec, ex-First Lady who has been exonerated by multiple Republican witch hunts including Trey “I’ll do anything for Power” Gowdy, and Kenneth “I have no moral Compass” Starr and who has spent her entire life as a much applauded public servant (by Republicans and Democrats)…

          ….Is somehow a worse choice than the flaming orange human Caps-Lock key who has over 3500 lawsuits filed against him, regularly cons people out of money or simply refuses to pay them at all, is under investigation for 3 different rape allegations, is being taken to court right now for multiple cons including Trump University which he personally set up and personally promoted, and has been proven over and over to be an especially ignorant pathological liar.

          I can’t for the life of me understand how you could remotely consider these two people as even on the same planet… much less similar.

          Even more bluntly:
          Hillary was cleared of the Benghazi witch hunt.
          Trump just insulted the parents of a war veteran who sacrificed his life for his country.

          Exactly how f**king stupid are you?
          Where is your “Benghazi-level” outrage over Trump’s comments?

          So apparently it’s fine if Trump pisses on our vets, calls minorities rapists, and lies 24/7… But god help anyone salutes with a coffee cup in their hand… or gets a talking point wrong in a news update in the middle of a crisis…. or sends email that is not marked classified correctly. Yep those are the real felonies.


          1. toejam August 3, 2016

            You have been taking lessons from your goddess Hillary.

          2. GodBlessRealAmerica! August 3, 2016

            She belongs in jail

    2. loveofcountry August 1, 2016

      Benazir Bhetto fled her country because she feared for her life. She returned and a short time later was murdered. She did not hold her position of power very long.

      1. Dominick Vila August 2, 2016

        She was elected by a majority of her fellow citizens who believed she not only had the right to speak, but the right to govern. She was, indeed, murdered by a terrorist.
        Painting other cultures in a way designed to satisfy our narrative may impress participants in a Trump rally, but it does not represent reality.

    3. toejam August 3, 2016

      You are so full of crap you could fertilize the planet.

  8. noonloon August 1, 2016

    Another example of Trump’s narcissistic personality disorder: He is never wrong; he never takes responsibility; he is always misunderstood; and the most telling, he never apologizes because he is infallible.

  9. dpaano August 1, 2016

    First of all, Stone should be hung by his fingernails…..what a jackass! As for Lewandowski, he’s just trying to get back into Trump’s good graces…..apparently, he hasn’t learned that the Iraqi war wasn’t started by President Obama, but by his own George W. Bush. We can blame the Republicans for that one…..and in no way can you actually stoop so low as to blame President Obama! As for the rest of the pundits who have TRIED to pull Trump’s foot out of his mouth….good luck with that! Those of us who have intelligence sympathize with Mr. & Mrs. Khan. Their son was a TRUE hero and sacrificed his life for this country! As for Trump’s “sacrifice,” I don’t think you can count building many buildings, hiring “thousands and tens of thousands” of workers (who, by the way were either rarely paid or who were brought here from Poland to work for a pittance by Mr. Trump) as being a “sacrifice” for Trump. He made money on all those buildings and cheating the workers out of their paychecks….it’s not as if he lost an actual child to a war! Those that seem to think that Trump has a viable gripe against the Khan’s need to be re-educated because they have obviously been led to believe everything the GOP throws out there……damned the facts!

    1. Sand_Cat August 1, 2016

      Rhetoric aside, I’m sure you know the modern Republican Party will stoop to anything, and I do mean anything, to win. :>)

      1. Insinnergy August 2, 2016

        That’s why our trolls have to type.
        They can’t talk with The Donald’s c*** so far down their throats.

        1. toejam August 3, 2016

          You are so clever and crude.

      2. loveofcountry August 2, 2016

        Lovely talk. Disgraceful.

      3. toejam August 3, 2016

        Just following Hillarys lead.

    2. toejam August 2, 2016

      Khan is a Muslim his son was a Muslim he was in the middle east fighting and killing Muslims. Instead the Muslims killed him. Why does that make him any more special than all the other troops who were killed? We need the opinion of ISIS on his hero status. The whole story by the Kahn Muslim daddy sounds a little contrived.Where did Obama serve? or HIllary?My wife aunt is a retired army colonel maybe she should run for president. According to Kahn the only way to be a hero and make a sacrifice is to go try and kill your own kind. My wife’s dad was a tank commander who fought in the battle of the bulge I wonder what he would have to say about Kahns horse crap. He came home and became a rocket scientist and a leading research scientist with therm o plastics. Neither of his children have been in a war does that make them any less of a person than Kahns apostate Muslin off spring? How many wars have you fought in? IF we don’t stop picking each other to death we will be defeated and lose it all. I am a lot older than this Kahn person and I would take a passel of bullets to keep our flag flying, would he????? Would you? For me America comes first I am a little to the right of Genghis Kahn. Political correctness is something you use to sight in your rifle.

      1. Insinnergy August 2, 2016

        Donald? Is that you?
        The word-salad is strong here.

        Let me throw some perspective your way, angry ex-military word-salad guy. Do you think you might be offended if I called you an: “idiot knuckle-dragging halfwit racist ass-cake with limited intelligence and a firm grasp on bigotry.”??

        I suspect the answer is yes.

        Why do I not do that? Because it’s not nice, polite or as you put it: Politically correct.

        You see… everyone has things they would rather not be called. The hallmark of a civilised society is that we try and stay away from calling people by names associated with racism, bigotry, hate, misogyny, and extremely dark periods in history. For civilised and reasonable discourse we try to use words that don’t incite fear, anger or hate and pick terms that don’t have those same associations.

        The really odd thing is that white moronic f**ktards like yourself regard political correctness as bad. Mainly because I think you see it as something blocking you from talking about spics, and wetbacks and niggers in the way your daddy taught you… yet the minute any one of those minorities calls you, for example, a retarded racist KKK-loving ex-grunt redneck sister f**ker… then you get all bent out of shape.

        Why bro?
        Isn’t political correctness the thing you want to get rid of?
        So I should be able to call you whatever I like, and you won’t mind…
        Right, pinhead?

        1. Bullseye August 2, 2016

          Political correctness supersedes what was called good manners, civility, respect, politeness. It -PC-has fostered a double standard system that promotes racism and other ills that it supposedly would have corrected. For example I, a Caucasian, can’t use the N word as I will be considered a racist. Yet black folk toss it about at will. I find being called honky or cracker just plain insulting but I have to buck up and take it. That’s one example of why PC is a joke and why Trump is able to behave as he does. The public is tired of the government promoted hypocrisy.

          1. dpaano August 3, 2016

            No, most of the public are tired of the constant hate going on between the parties…..this never used to be a problem, but it seems lately that the parties are only divided by hate! Where did all that come from? I blame it on Gingrich….when he was Speaker, he ordered all the Republican senators and congressmen/women to no longer socialize with democrats. Since then, there has been NO reaching across the aisle, no negotiations, no talking out problems and reaching a consensus that works for this country. All it has done is divide even more the two parties and, in doing that, has accomplished NOTHING for this country. It’s pretty sad because hate is such a strong word, and to “hate” someone just because they don’t particularly agree with you is childish and ridiculous! I certainly don’t hate most Republicans…..I don’t have to agree with them all the time, but I don’t hate them. I also try, although sometimes it’s difficult, to respect their comments. But, as I said, in some cases, you just reach a limit and you respond in kind! With as many problems as we have on this small planet, we shouldn’t be wasting our time hating one another and being respectful of their individual beliefs. After all, we ALL have that thing called “freedom of speech,” but that doesn’t mean treating others rudely and calling them names. The whole thing with this election is just going too far!

          2. Bullseye August 11, 2016

            Unfortunately, freedom of speech is unqualified. Rudeness is permitted. The lack of respect, courtesy and the like have gone to the way side, it seems, and regrettably so. Congress has one primary job: To govern. It controls the distribution of funds as part of that function. The 2 parties chose to not do their job is obvious by the lack of compromise in their attempts to govern. I don’t care what party a legislator belongs to. Once they are in office, I do not want to hear them making decisions based on their party affiliation. With the highly diverse nature of our citizens somebody will always be unhappy about a government policy. Congress, all of the government actually, is obligated to follow what the majority wants to have. That does not mean that minorities are ignored, but neither does it mean that minorities are to receive preferential treatment. Over the last few decades since the big push for equality and fair treatment became SOP, the minority groups that have prospered have done so by integrating into the American fabric, rather than holding out with the same destructive no-compromise attitude that Congress displays.

          3. Insinnergy August 3, 2016

            So your elegant and well-reasoned rebuttal is that you can’t say the “N-word” but black people can… and you have to accept being called Honky or Cracker?

            Let me recast that in a way that highlights your stupidity. It the equivalent of saying:
            I hate the laws against stealing because I can’t steal my neighbor’s car and drive it wherever I like.. but HE can… and I just have to accept being occasionally burgled by criminals.

            Now let’s break it down:
            -> You not being able to say the “N-word”… That’s right. Because it’s hateful, disrespectful, and designed specifically to remind black people they were slaves when used by a white person. In other words using it is a form of hate-crime.

            -> Black people being able to use the “N-word:… That’s right. Because when stated by one black person to another it’s intention and tone is to remind them that they share a difficult heritage and a shared struggle that typically is a DAILY struggle against institutionalised racism in the USA. In other words when used by a black person it’s a reminder of shared values.

            -> You “having to accept” being called a Honky or Cracker… No. Political Correctness cuts both ways. Its just as bad for you to call a black person the “N-word” as it is for a minority person to call you a Cracker. This is also a form of hate crime. You do not have to accept this at all, neither is it right, or justified or “allowed” under Political correctness.

            There is no double standard.
            There is simply a standard.

          4. Bullseye August 11, 2016

            You missed the point. The use of cracker or honky to reference a causian doesn’t raise any ire, but whip out that N word and the wrath of big brother and PC minions are up in arms. Note that on many, many blogs spelling out the n word will result in the comment being deleted and/or the poster being banned. Not so with cracker or honky. As I said, political correctness is a joke. The “authorities” such as the government and media hacks have chosen to selectively apply political correctness, favoring whatever will generate the most attention and revenue.

    3. ivory69690@yahoo.com August 2, 2016

      Trump’s “sacrifice’s only for himself and to make money . and if the worse happens and he dose not make enough money he always falls back on his snake trick and dosent pay the people that already did the work . he leaves all his evil ends open to screw as many as he can that’s the only kind of a Trump’s “sacrifice.

    4. GodBlessRealAmerica! August 2, 2016

      Damn you are ignorant!

      1. toejam August 3, 2016

        She claims to belong to mensa, dosen’t that make her special??

        1. GodBlessRealAmerica! August 3, 2016

          The fraud!

  10. jan August 1, 2016

    “If Donald Trump were the president, Captain Khan would still be alive today because we would have never entered the Iraq War.” So is he saying Trump should go back in time ? or will go back in time if elected?

    1. Sand_Cat August 1, 2016

      He’s pretty far back without traveling.

    2. Independent1 August 1, 2016

      It Donald Trump were the president, America would be an island in and of itself, which no other nations on earth would deal with outside Russia and North Korea; and would have a 20′ barbed wire fence all around it with armed guards on every street corner of every city and town to ensure that no peoples outside of Trump’s immediate white supremacist friends were allowed to roam freely.

      1. ivory69690@yahoo.com August 2, 2016

        then the USA can always hope DONNY DUMP takes his DUMPSTER plane and gets shot down . and radar will see the shot on their screen and say awwwwwwwwwwww that’s nothing let it go

    3. ivory69690@yahoo.com August 2, 2016

      send the DUMPSTER back in time to the point of his start (right before it ) and change it to a BJ then spit the POS in the toilet bowl or swallow him then crap him out and flush him . not there’ s a time travel the country and the world would love

    4. dpaano August 2, 2016

      We could ONLY hope….perhaps back to the Neanderthal period, which is more where he would fit in!!

      1. GodBlessRealAmerica! August 2, 2016


  11. Elliot J. Stamler August 1, 2016

    Roger Stone like Dick Morris is one of those poisonous barnacles that has attached himself to the Republican Party because no prominent Republican has yet to have the simple courage to say to him: You are a filthy rat and we don’t want to have anything to do with you. That in turn is because the entire Republican Party of today is run and ruled by filthy rats.

    1. ivory69690@yahoo.com August 2, 2016

      and that’s talking nice about them

      1. Elliot J. Stamler August 2, 2016

        The American Cockroach Assn. has today issued a statement accusing me of unfairly excluding them in characterizing the Republican Party was being run and ruled by filthy rats. Their statement declares that cockroaches have just as many rights as rats and I have no business ignoring their equal filthiness.

        1. ivory69690@yahoo.com August 2, 2016

          Seems there’s only one thing you can do now you have to GO TO WAR WITH THEM

    2. dpaano August 2, 2016

      I don’t really like to malign the rats…..they are such cute pets!!!

  12. ivory69690@yahoo.com August 2, 2016

    Trump fought back by attacking Mr. Khan’s wife for not speaking during her husband’s remarks and claiming that the sacrifices he made as a businessman were similar to the Khans’. /// are you kidding me ? the only sacrifices the DUMPSTER made and or makes is he seems to think that throwing people under the bus to make himself money is a big sacrifice for him . any and all sacrifice’s DONNY DUMP makes are just for him no one else (unless he would make money off it ) he says he made sacrifice’s by making 1000’s of jobs then said 10,000’s of jobs . that not a sacrifice that’s his business no sacrifices A JOB . he might take risk by not paying people that worked for him stiffing them all (and or as many as he can ) more risk he takes are the risks of fraud , con , and scamming people and the risk is that one he screwed might just get to him with the crosshairs set up between his beedy rat eyes . and was it the DUMPSTER that helped to come up with this new one (Roger Stone’s tweet links to an article on a low-budget conspiracy site that accuses Mr. Khan of having links to groups planning a “military conquest” of the U.S., and shamelessly suggests that Mr. Khan’s son, Humayun Khan, may have been planning a suicide attack on his fellow soldiers)? yup and its ROGER STONE I bet that is sad that those ISIS terrorist where killed and not the American soldiers right ? no shame . one question is how evil like this live in our country and how thy live with them self’s just down right evil anti-Christ followers

  13. ivory69690@yahoo.com August 2, 2016

    these days why are there so many unarmed people being murdered when there is POS like the DUMPSTER and STONE out of his mind walking around . if any one see stone on the road getting pulled over by the police pull over too and when you see the cop walking up to Stone’s car door yell out you car window real loud GUNNNNNNNNN HE HAS A GUNNNNNNNNNNNN

    1. GodBlessRealAmerica! August 2, 2016


      1. Insinnergy August 2, 2016

        Hello little basement-dwelling forum pee-goblin.
        I see you’re still spending all your time where you are roundly hated.
        I wonder what sort of person wastes hours and hours of their time sitting on a Liberal leaning site and posting racist, bigoted, divisive republican brain burps in a desperate attempt to pretend that someone notices them…?
        What a sad little troll.

        However, thank you for giving me the pleasure of blocking yet another of your sockpuppets. It always makes me feel good to know that I’m ensuring that all this time you spend is utterly pointless.

        Ciao 🙂

        1. Aaron_of_Portsmouth August 2, 2016

          We’re surrounded by denizens of the underworld. Hopefully, researchers will come up with a repellent to repel these pests. Informed speech, patience, and intellect will be the best tools for now.

          Fare thee well.

        2. GodBlessRealAmerica! August 2, 2016

          Why u commenting against me I thought I was Blocked you scum bag liberal. Now go suicide bomb yo ass and make the globalist proud. I am exposing you Democrackhead liberals as scum looki @ you low energy, pathetic and really amusing better than liberal racist Saturday nite!!

          I sent you a present a wasserman blow up doll please enjoy you lunatic! Lol

  14. loveofcountry August 2, 2016

    If ye love wealth better than Liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom – Go from us in peace. We ask
    not your consul or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which
    feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen. Samuel Adams

  15. Yay Bubbles August 5, 2016

    this garbage is now considered to be reporting?

    Khan is liar. If the family is “grieving” as you put it, then why stand them up in front of million. Only the most stupid people are fooled by this nonsense, while the media call the REAL VICTIM HERE a grieving mother who lost her child due to Hillary’s incompetence a whore? a disgrace?

    Get real,.Khan family is not a grieving victim, it’s yet another Muslim Brotherhood who is part a law firm which will rake in millions.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.