Type to search

How CNN And Fox News Enabled The Worst Sexual Assault Apologism Of 2016

Campaign 2016 Elections Media Politics Top News

How CNN And Fox News Enabled The Worst Sexual Assault Apologism Of 2016

Sexual Assault

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters for America.

As sexual assault allegations against President-elect Donald Trump piled up in the months before the election, CNN and Fox News each relied on paid Trump surrogates and media allies to peddle some of the worst sexual assault apologism of the past year.

After uncovered 2005 audio showed Trump bragging about sexual assault, a number of women came forward with specific allegations against the then-candidate. In CNN and Fox’s coverage of Trump’s despicable comments, his media allies downplayed the severity of sexual assault and attacked the credibility of those who spoke out, while both networks initially characterized the comments as merely “vulgar” or “lewd.” When women came forward with specific accounts of being sexually assaulted or harassed by Trump, CNN and Fox gave ample airtime to paid surrogates and media allies who minimized and made excuses for Trump’s actions.

Sexual violence has no place in our society, let alone on cable news networks. So why did CNN and Fox spend the end of 2016 subsidizing media personalities to deny allegations and engage in pure sexual-assault apologism?

As Media Matters previously noted, CNN’s decision to hire and pay a number of professional Trump surrogates made the network a consistent platform for the campaign to trivialize the severity of sexual assault. CNN’s Trump surrogates — Corey Lewandowski, Jeffrey Lord, Kayleigh McEnany, and Scottie Nell Hughes — systematically dismissed Trump’s comments,calling them a “distraction” and framing them as normal “locker room” talk.

For example, Trump’s former campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, flippantly claimed that “nobody cares” that the nominee of a major political party was caught on tape bragging about sexual assault. Scottie Nell Hughes similarly argued that Trump’s deplorable comments were unimportant because “no woman woke up affected by these words” — ignoring the sheer number of social and political risks survivors face when reporting sexual assault and harassment.

Once women began to make their allegations public, CNN’s Trump surrogates focused their attention on normalizing sexual assault and attacking the credibility of the alleged survivors. Lewandowski questioned the timing and veracity of the reports, before deflecting questions by invoking discredited attacks on Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s work as a court-appointed defense attorney in the 1970s. When asked by CNN’s Anderson Cooper about the connections between the 2005 recording and specific allegations against Trump, paid apologist Kayleigh McEnany called the claims baseless and blamed Trump’s accusers because they “let him do X, Y, or Z. That implies consent.”

Fox fared no better in its coverage of Trump’s unacceptable comments. In addition to similarly dismissingTrump’s statements as “locker room talk,” “frat house language,” and “guy talk,” Fox employees also joined the effort to undermine the credibility of Trump’s accusers.

On the October 13 edition of Fox News’ Fox & Friends, Trump surrogate Ben Carson (now nominated to be a member of his cabinet) accused the “biased” press of manipulating the public by creating incentives for people to “come out and say something” in order to garner “fame.” Carson added, “What a bunch of crap.”

Fox’s Brian Kilmeade argued that “none of them are vetted” — referring to the accusers — and it was entirely possible that “they all could be lying.” Others questioned the timing of the myriad allegations against the Republican nominee, calling them “a little coordinated… a little too convenient,” and claiming that the proximity to the election meant “it’s fair to question why is this coming out now.” In reality, multiple media sources have corroborated most of the claims brought forth by Trump’s accusers.

In some cases, Fox personnel openly attacked individual women for speaking out, as seen in senior political analyst Brit Hume’s tirade against Jessica Drake — a Trump accuser who directs and performs in adult films. Hume responded to Drake’s allegations that Trump had “grabbed” and hugged and “kissed” her “without asking permission” with a series of tweets suggesting she could not be offended because of her profession.

Sexual assault is a serious issue. The National Sexual Violence Resource Center reports that “one in five women and one in 71 men will be raped at some point in their lives,” while the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey found that “nearly half”of its survey respondents (47 percent) “were sexually assaulted at some point in their lifetime.”

Despite widespread fearmongering from right-wing media that false rape reports are common, these incidents are actually a statistical minority — representing between 2 and 8 percent of all reported cases. Meanwhile, according to research by the Rape, Abuse & Incest Network (RAINN), 67 percent of rapes go unreported to law enforcement.

Reporting on rape and sexual assault has long been a challenge for journalists, regardless of who is involved. When the accused occupies a position of prominence, journalists and networks must refuse to let threats of lost access or demands for false balance sanitize their reporting. In May 2016 — before the Trump allegations — Woody Allen’s son Ronan Farrow published an article blasting the media for cultivating a “culture of impunity and silence” around reporting on sexual assault allegations. As Farrow explained, although it’s not the media’s job “to carry water” for those making accusations against powerful men, the media do have an “obligation to include the facts, and to take them seriously.”

On each of these charges, CNN and Fox clearly failed — enabling some of the worst sexual assault apologism of 2016.

IMAGE: Media Matters/Sarah Wasko



  1. Aaron_of_Portsmouth December 29, 2016

    It’s understandable that FOX would discount sexual assault charges against Trump, and that legions of Trump’s toadies—men and women—would come out of the woodwork in support of this atrocious display of lewd and lascivious thoughts and behavior of the soon-to-be-crowned egoist, Lord Trump.
    But for CNN and all other reputable outlets to give Donald a pass without keeping the spotlight on him is unconscionable. Well, it’s too late now as we will inaugurate the first emperor America has ever had, as well as its first openly-lewd braggadocious President to be.

    At least the media can make up for this after inauguration by referencing Donald as “President Braggadocious Trump” whenever writing about him henceforth. There is no way to excuse what Trump did, the manner in which he did it, and to allow him to walk free.

    1. dbtheonly December 29, 2016

      Exactly Aaron,

      Though I question how much more “spotlight” beyond the repetition of the tape would be considered “acceptable”

      I’ll go with your Bragido, Bragiddo, Braggiggog…

      How about if I just keep calling him Trump?

      1. Aaron_of_Portsmouth December 30, 2016

        Yes, we may call Trump a variety of things—things too numerous and unwholesome to mention. But, we must never allow Trump himself to slink into the shelter of “The Presidency”, and away from the spotlight of his despicable acts so that we might become forgetful of his inner nature and outward deeds.

        The designation President Trump. or just Trump, is too kind for such an amoral and boorish person.

        1. kep December 31, 2016

          Allegations, nothing more. The Clinton’s have always used allegations of sexual misconduct to discredit any and all of their political rivals. Ironically, Bill Clinton is the worst sexual predator ever to hold any office.

          1. Aaron_of_Portsmouth January 1, 2017

            Having Clinton-on-the-Brain does not do you any good. Just discounting Trump’s egregious and satanic behavior doesn’t wash the filth off of him.
            If you’ll just take the time to stop fawning excessively over Trump, try acting like a mature man for a change, you’ll be able to say something intelligent and wipe the cobwebs from your eyes.

          2. kep January 1, 2017

            Perhaps if you would try to see all the damage liberal commies have done to America, you might see Trump as our savior. We have a far too powerful, far too corrupt government, with our politicians becoming our new ruling class. Our country was never designed to have a royal family, in fact, we fought against it. However, liberal communists want to see America become more like a soviet style communist regime, whereas the ruling class and party members have everything, while the rest of Americans stand in line to get basic necessities. Try to open YOUR eyes.

          3. Aaron_of_Portsmouth January 1, 2017

            Kep, you’re blind in one eye, and have macular degeneration in the other. Do you keep score of wrongs committed by the Left while ignoring the innumerable wrongs of the Right? Or are you just a paid sycophant for the GOP and Putin?

          4. kep January 1, 2017

            You seem to have missed the point. Our entire government is corrupt, both sides. Trump is neither. What I, and millions of others like me want is to see America returned to what it is supposed to be, a government by the people, for the people. What the liberal commies want is a government ruled by a ruling class, where the American people serve the government and the ruling class.

      2. Sylviacroberts December 30, 2016

        Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj494d:
        On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
        ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash494MarketHomeGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!mj494d:….,…..

  2. abigail.carter December 30, 2016

    I’ve earned $84 ,000 until now now working on-line however I am a full time college student . I’m by making use of a web based business marketing opportunity I discovered and after that I’ve made such type of decent cash . It’s extremely convenient to use and I am just too glad that I discovered out about it . The possibility of success using this is end-less . Here’s everything that I do>>> http://secure02.weebly.com

  3. mary.scott.91 December 31, 2016

    I’ve generated $84 ,000 up to now this season working on-line and I am only a full time student . I’m utilizing a home business opportunity I found out about and in addition I’ve earned such type of good money . It’s really convenient to use not to mention I am just too satisfied that I found out regarding it . The possibility using this is endless . Here’s everything that I do>>> http://secure37.com


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Next Up